These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658088)
1. Of causes and clients: two tales of Roe v. Wade. McMunigal KC Hastings Law J; 1996 Mar; 47(3):779-819. PubMed ID: 11658088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade. Bezanson RP Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Criminal abortion revisited. Buell SW N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 66(6):1774-831. PubMed ID: 11652642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion and a nation at war. First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real. Pine RN; Law SA Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Forced labor: a thirteenth amendment defense of abortion. Koppelman A Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1990; 84(2):480-535. PubMed ID: 11656392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one. Estrich SR; Sullivan KM Univ PA Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 138(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 11656496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Keep your laws off my body": abortion regulation and the takings clause. Looper-Friedman SE New Engl Law Rev; 1995; 29(2):253-84. PubMed ID: 11656525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The abortion struggle in America. Warren MA Bioethics; 1989 Oct; 3(4):320-32. PubMed ID: 11651956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose. Binion G Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Losing the negative right of privacy: building sexual and reproductive freedom. Copelon R Rev Law Soc Change; 1990-1991; 18(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 11656169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Notes from the field: a reply to Professor Colker. Burns SE Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():189-206. PubMed ID: 11656054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion rights in America. Bullock JR Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Making rights real: Roe's impact on abortion access. Fung A Polit Soc; 1993 Dec; 21(4):465-504. PubMed ID: 11659973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reasoning from the body: a historical perspective on abortion regulation and questions of equal protection. Siegel R Stanford Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 44(2):261-381. PubMed ID: 11656213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal abortion under fierce attack 15 years after Roe v. Wade ruling. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1988 May; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron. Coleman JJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Justice Holmes and Roe v. Wade. Novick SM Trial; 1989 Dec; 25(12):58-64. PubMed ID: 11656018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. Colker R Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Supreme Court, 5-4, narrowing Roe v. Wade, upholds sharp state limits on abortion. Greenhouse L; Dionne EJ N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():1, 10-13. PubMed ID: 11646725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]