These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658088)

  • 21. The anatomy of the A-word.
    Tarvers JK
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1991; 21(4):41-2. PubMed ID: 11642932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
    Linton PB
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Woman behind the symbols in abortion debate.
    Belkin L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 May; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11647410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
    Destro RA
    Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A woman's right, barely viable.
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():28. PubMed ID: 11646727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A legal strategy to overturn Roe v. Wade after Webster: some lessons from Lincoln.
    Forsythe CD
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):519-60. PubMed ID: 11656174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. After Roe v. Wade: 10 years' conflict over abortion.
    Peterson B; Barbash F; Russell C
    Washington Post; 1983 Jan; ():A1, A12-13. PubMed ID: 11647346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Debate distant for many having abortions.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1998 Jan; ():A1, A9. PubMed ID: 11647532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Understanding the new politics of abortion: a framework and agenda for research.
    Goggin ML
    Am Polit Q; 1993 Jan; 21(1):4-30. PubMed ID: 11656206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Burying the dead: the case against revival of pre-Roe and pre-Casey abortion statutes in a post-Casey world.
    Scott TL
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):355-89. PubMed ID: 11656256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Will Roe v. Wade survive the Rehnquist Court?
    Johnsen D; Wilder M
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):457-69. PubMed ID: 11650350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Moral sentiment in judicial opinions on abortion.
    Moore EN
    Santa Clara Lawyer; 1975; 15(3):591-634. PubMed ID: 11663584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Unraveling compromise.
    Olsen F
    Harv Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 103(1):105-35. PubMed ID: 11655993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the role of stare decisis.
    Laird V
    Mod Law Rev; 1994 May; 57(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 11656439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Autonomy's magic wand: abortion and constitutional interpretation.
    Allen AL
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1992 Sep; 72(4):683-98. PubMed ID: 11656223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The author of Roe.
    Rao R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1998; 26(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 12666685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.