These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658115)
21. Power and procreation: state interference in pregnancy. Hanigsberg JE Ottawa Law Rev; 1991; 23(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 11656189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The search for coherence in reproductive policy. Merz JF J Leg Med; 1996 Mar; 17(1):169-76. PubMed ID: 11644847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color. Krauss DJ Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans. Rhoden NK Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Of gametes and guardians: the impropriety of appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses and embryos. Goldberg S Wash Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 66(2):503-44. PubMed ID: 11656073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Judicial intervention in pregnancy. Martin S; Coleman M McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution. Dawson TB Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The body invaded: medical surveillance of women as reproducers. Terry J Social Rev; 1989; 89(3):13-43. PubMed ID: 11655979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Medicolegal implications of constitutional status for the unborn: "ambulatory chalices" or "priorities and aspirations. Tolton C Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1988; 47(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 11655976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Toward guidelines for compelling cesarean surgery: of rights, responsibility, and decisional authenticity. Finer JJ Minn Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 76(2):239-94. PubMed ID: 11659551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Courts acting to force care of the unborn. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1987 Nov; ():A1, B10. PubMed ID: 11647835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The troubling question of 'fetal rights': should denying care to the unborn be a crime? Begley S; Wingert P; Huck J; Quade V Newsweek; 1986 Dec; 108(23):87. PubMed ID: 11653763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Fetal surgery: a developing legal dilemma. Rauscher K St Louis Univ Law J; 1987 Sep; 31(3):775-95. PubMed ID: 11658987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Court-ordered prenatal intervention: a final means to the end of gestational substance abuse. Flannery MT J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(3):519-604. PubMed ID: 11659750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Court-ordered cesareans: a growing concern for indigent women. Daniels JA Clgh Rev; 1988 Feb; 21(9):1064-71. PubMed ID: 11649972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Adventures in babysitting: gestational surrogate mother tort liability. Bussel KA Duke Law J; 1991 Dec; 41(3):661-90. PubMed ID: 11659580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Reproductive responsibilities: rethinking the fetal rights debate. Burtt S Policy Sci; 1994; 27(2-3):179-96. PubMed ID: 11656483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Genetic screening and counseling: the legal and ethical issues. Waltz JR; Thigpen CR Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(4):696-768. PubMed ID: 11662927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Selective abortion and the diagnosis of fetal damage: issues and concerns. Cohen LG J Assoc Pers Sev Handicaps; 1986; 11(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 11655848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]