BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658170)

  • 1. A choice of one's own research advance directives: anticipatory planning for research subjects with fluctuating or prospective decisionmaking impairments.
    Backlar P
    Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):117-28. PubMed ID: 11658170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The forum. Respecting and protecting mentally impaired persons in medical research.
    Fisher CB
    Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 12656072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Planning for future research participation: ethical and practical considerations.
    Dresser R
    Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):129-36. PubMed ID: 11658171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anticipatory planning for research participants with psychotic disorders like schizophrenia.
    Backlar P
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):829-53. PubMed ID: 12807102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patients' competence to consent to neurobiological research.
    Appelbaum PS
    Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):241-51. PubMed ID: 11654519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consent to research with impaired human subjects: a trial policy for the intramural programs of the National Institutes of Health.
    Fletcher JC; Dommel FW; Cowell DD
    IRB; 1985; 7(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The psychology of competence and informed consent: understanding decision-making with regard to clinical practice.
    Rosenfeld B
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):173-85. PubMed ID: 15868668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The forum. Competence to consent to research: where psychology, ethics, and the law intersect.
    Rosenfeld B
    Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):284-7. PubMed ID: 12656073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethical and human-rights issues in research on mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity.
    Capron AM
    N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1430-4. PubMed ID: 10228198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The forum. Autonomy, beneficence, and justice in the wider context.
    Walker MU
    Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):279-80, 291-3. PubMed ID: 12656076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Empirical research on informed consent with the cognitively impaired.
    Hougham GW; Sachs GA; Danner D; Mintz J; Patterson M; Roberts LW; Siminoff LA; Sugarman J; Whitehouse PJ; Wirshing D
    IRB; 2003; Suppl 25(5):S26-S32. PubMed ID: 14870736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Informed consent and the right to refuse or participate.
    Frese FJ
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 11653325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The subject advocate: protecting the interests of participants with fluctuating decisionmaking capacity.
    Stroup S; Appelbaum P
    IRB; 2003; 25(3):9-11. PubMed ID: 14569988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How can valid informed consent be obtained from a psychotic patient for research into psychosis? Three perspectives.
    Freckelton I; Keks N; Howe V; Foister K; Jenkins K; Copolov D; Sullivan D
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2003 Oct; 22(4):60-75. PubMed ID: 15069966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are research ethics bad for our mental health?
    Michels R
    N Engl J Med; 1999 May; 340(18):1427-30. PubMed ID: 10228197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informed consent in psychiatric research.
    Roth LH; Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW; Benson P; Winslade WJ
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):425-41. PubMed ID: 11659013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ethics of involving psychiatrically impaired persons in research.
    DeRenzo EG
    IRB; 1994; 16(6):7-9, 11. PubMed ID: 11659990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward an informed discussion of informed consent: a review and critique of the empirical studies.
    Meisel A; Roth LH
    Ariz Law Rev; 1983; 25(2):265-346. PubMed ID: 11658677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New law proposed for treating mentally incapacitated people.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1993 May; 306(6887):1226. PubMed ID: 11643132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why the tolerance of potential harms? Research ethics in Alzheimer disease.
    Post SG
    Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):241-53. PubMed ID: 11658179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.