336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658183)
1. Is national, independent oversight needed for the protection of human subjects?
Capron AM
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):283-92. PubMed ID: 11658183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. National, independent oversight: reinforcing the safety net for human subjects research.
Mastroianni AC
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):303-9. PubMed ID: 11658185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Neurobiological research involving human subjects: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks.
Puglisi JT; Ellis GB
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11654521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An introduction to NBAC's report on research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity.
Childress JF
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):101-15. PubMed ID: 11658169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Protection of human subjects.
United States
Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review Board.
Levine C; Caplan AL
IRB; 1986; 8(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11649751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.
United States
US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules.
Wilson DJ
Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11652293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research.
Jellinek MS; Levine RJ
IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. U.S. Bioethics Commission meets, outlines agenda.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1996 Nov; 14(11):1533. PubMed ID: 11644890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Proposed regulations for research involving those institutionalized as mentally infirm: a consideration of their relevance in 1995.
Levine RJ
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):177-86. PubMed ID: 11654513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Unregulated research with human subjects.
Shamoo AE
Account Res; 1999; 6(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 11658124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical research involving children: some legal and ethical issues.
Langer DH
Bayl Law Rev; 1984; 36(1):1-39. PubMed ID: 11658558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Commission says institutional review boards should change procedures now.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Much more research to fall under IRB review.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jul; 14(7):3. PubMed ID: 11658059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. IRBs and research with human biological materials.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):2. PubMed ID: 11657556
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Why we need a national human experimentation agency.
Annas GJ
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):293-302. PubMed ID: 11658184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical and legal considerations in dental caries research involving human subjects.
Branson R
J Dent Res; 1980 Jul; 59(Special Issue C):1214-364. PubMed ID: 11651755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
