These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658211)
41. A word to Varmus. Pryor D; Hatfield M; Wyden R; Waxman HA Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 11644858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Federal report says protection of human subjects is threatened by numerous factors. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1996 May; 11(5):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Research and ethics committees. Nightingale SL Lancet; 1983 Jun; 1(8338):1389. PubMed ID: 11644258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. When the subjects are hospital staff, is it ethical (or possible) to get informed consent? Geller JL; Lidz CW; Pattulo EL IRB; 1987; 9(5):4-8. PubMed ID: 11649898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Government guinea pigs. Rothman DJ N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan; ():E21. PubMed ID: 11646304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. American IRBs and Dutch research ethics committees: how they compare. Bergkamp L IRB; 1988; 10(5):1-6. PubMed ID: 11650072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners. Herch F; Flower R Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Exception from informed consent for emergency research: drawing on existing skills and experience. Davis AM IRB; 1998; 20(5):1-8. PubMed ID: 11657584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Informed consent in human experimentation: bridging the gap between ethical thought and current practice. Delgado R; Leskovac H UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):67-130. PubMed ID: 11659049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations. Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. If it's research, it must be reviewed: an NIH reprimand. Levine C Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 11643913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. President's Commission seeks information on reported violations of subject protection. IRB; 1980 Nov; 2(9):9. PubMed ID: 11661887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules. Wilson DJ Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11652293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. In tests on people, who watches the watchers? Hilts PJ N Y Times Web; 1999 May; ():F1, F4. PubMed ID: 11648129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Protection of human subjects; new drugs for investigational use; conforming amendments; final rule. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Fed Regist; 1984 Oct; 49(212):43637-8. PubMed ID: 11645532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Children as experimental subjects: a review of ethical and theological issues. Bolster MC Linacre Q; 1998 May; 65(2):6-32. PubMed ID: 11655360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey. Katz J IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]