190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658232)
1. Why be my colleague's keeper? Moral justifications for peer review.
Cain J
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Oct; 5(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 11658232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Conducting and reporting research.
Bird SJ; Housman DE
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):127-54. PubMed ID: 11655035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Honest research.
Hillman H
Sci Eng Ethics; 1995 Jan; 1(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 11657880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethics and relationships in laboratories and research communities.
Weil V; Arzbaecher R
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):83-125. PubMed ID: 11655042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Social epistemology and the ethics of research.
Resnik D
Stud Hist Philos Sci; 1996 Dec; 27(4):565-86. PubMed ID: 11645816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Character and the ethical conduct of research.
Pellegrino ED
Account Res; 1992; 2(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11651456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Parafraud in biology.
Hillman H
Sci Eng Ethics; 1997 Apr; 3(2):121-36. PubMed ID: 11657883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Inappropriate authorship in collaborative science research.
Pennock RT
Public Aff Q; 1996 Oct; 10(4):379-93. PubMed ID: 11654653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. New requirements for authors: signed statements of authorship responsibility and financial disclosure.
Lundberg GD; Flanagin A
JAMA; 1989 Oct; 262(14):2003-4. PubMed ID: 2778937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Conflicts of interest and conflicts of commitment.
Werhane P; Doering J
Prof Ethics; 1995; 4(3-4):47-81. PubMed ID: 11655040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical values in the education of biomedical researchers.
Heitman E
Hastings Cent Rep; 2000; 30(4 Suppl):S40-4. PubMed ID: 11658244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Editorial ethics.
Benatar SR
BMJ; 1998 Jan; 316(7125):155-6. PubMed ID: 11645021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes.
Fox MF
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 11653366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Editorial ethics questioned.
Vogel G
Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5303):1055. PubMed ID: 11644901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of conflict of interest in scientific objectivity: a case of a Nobel Prize work.
Shamoo AE
Account Res; 1992; 2(1):55-75. PubMed ID: 11651457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Bioetiquette.
Martin J; Stent GS
Perspect Biol Med; 1998; 41(2):267-81. PubMed ID: 11645029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical guidelines for publications of research.
Endocrine Society. Council
J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 1998 Jan; 83(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 11645018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Authorship Ethics in the Era of Team Science.
Hammer MJ; Miaskowski C
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2017 Nov; 44(6):655-657. PubMed ID: 29052665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On being an authentic scientist.
Smith ML
IRB; 1992; 14(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 11651243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular geneticists and moral responsibility: "maybe if we were working on the atom bomb I would have a different argument.
Nicholas B
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Oct; 5(4):515-30. PubMed ID: 11658231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
