These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658268)

  • 1. Constitutional privacy in psychotherapy.
    Smith SR
    George Washington Law Rev; 1980 Nov; 49(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 11658268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The psychotherapist-client testimonial privilege: defining the professional involved.
    Dubbelday CJ
    Emory Law J; 1985; 34(3-4):777-826. PubMed ID: 11658791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The privilege study: an empirical examination of the psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Shuman DW; Weiner MS
    North Carol Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 60(5):893-942. PubMed ID: 11658717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accommodating patient rights and computerized mental health systems.
    Gobert JJ
    North Carol Law Rev; 1976 Jan; 54(2):153-87. PubMed ID: 11664607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence law--the psychotherapist-patient privilege in federal courts.
    Cerveny K; Kent MJ
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1984; 59(3):791-816. PubMed ID: 11658789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Privacy: drug use reporting requirements unconstitutional.
    Brown DC
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1977; 2(1):127-36. PubMed ID: 11661516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marching to the beat of a different drummer: is military law and mental health out-of-step after Jaffee v. Redmond?
    Zanotti BJ; Becker RA
    Air Force Law Rev; 1997; 41():1-82. PubMed ID: 16211752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Caesar v. Mountanos. 13 Sep 1976.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Fed Report; 1976; 542():1064-75. PubMed ID: 11645999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overt dangerous behavior as a constitutional requirement for involuntary civil commitment of the mentally ill.
    Groethe R
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1977; 44(3):562-93. PubMed ID: 11664853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protecting the confidentiality of pretrial psychiatric disclosures: a survey of standards.
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1976 Jun; 51(3):409-45. PubMed ID: 11664622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Constitutional law--Fourteenth Amendment--due process--civil commitment--mentally ill and retarded juveniles.
    Arena RM
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1980; 18(4):969-82. PubMed ID: 11658429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutional law--due process--North Carolina compulsory sterilization statute held constitutional against challenge that it constituted an unlawful invasion of privacy.
    Weathered F
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1976; 8(2):436-45. PubMed ID: 11664735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constitutional law--confinement of nondangerous mentally ill capable of surviving safely in freedom held to violate patient's right to "liberty".
    Hancock GC
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 11664793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Constitutional law: does a privacy right protect a bar applicant's mental health records from complete disclosure? Florida Board of Bar Examiners, Re: Applicant, 443 So.2d 71 (Fla. 1983).
    Teagle BL
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1984; 36(3):537-44. PubMed ID: 11649802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The psychotherapist-patient privilege: are some patients more privileged than others?
    Stroube MK
    Pac Law J; 1979 Jul; 10(2):801-24. PubMed ID: 11661824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Due process limitations on parental rights to commit children to mental institutions.
    Holladay JN
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1977; 48(2):235-66. PubMed ID: 11664712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The limits of constitutional privacy in the psychotherapist-patient evidentiary privilege.
    Maly B
    Gold Gate Law Rev; 1977; 8(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 11661694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
    Cort RS
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Justices uphold psychotherapy privacy rights.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun; ():A1, A25. PubMed ID: 11648020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constitutional law: standard of proof in involuntary civil commitments.
    Whiteman DL
    Washburn Law J; 1980; 19(2):350-8. PubMed ID: 11658363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.