These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658270)
1. Procedural safeguards for periodic review: a new commitment to mental patients' rights. Yale Law J; 1979 Mar; 88(4):850-67. PubMed ID: 11658270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill. Neff RC Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment. Roth LH Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Revising Pennsylvania's involuntary civil commitment statute. Vater JA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 11664513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In search of a sane commitment statute. Treffert DA; Krajeck RW Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An overview of state involuntary civil commitment statutes. Van Duizend R; McGraw BD; Keilitz I Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 11658581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Involuntary commitment of the mentally ill. Troland MB Mont Law Rev; 1977; 38(2):307-25. PubMed ID: 11664835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Civil commitment of the mentally ill in California: the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act. Hart MA Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 7(1):93-136. PubMed ID: 11664312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question. Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The standard of proof necessary in involuntary civil commitment of the mentally ill. Coleman SS S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(2):379-91. PubMed ID: 11665199 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Law, psychotherapy and the duty to warn: a tragic trilogy? Ayres RJ; Holbrook JT Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(4):677-705. PubMed ID: 11664669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients. Belzer I UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The rights of mental health detainees. Robinson DA; Motz BM Los Angel Lawyer; 1982; 5(5):10-5. PubMed ID: 11653529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Balancing the interests: the move towards less restrictive commitment of New York's mentally ill. Cameron JD N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1988; 14(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 11659083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Civil commitment in Wisconsin: the impact of Lessard v. Schmidt. Zander TK Wis L Rev; 1976; 1976(2):503-62. PubMed ID: 11664748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of the court as mental health laws change. Flaschner FN Ill Bar J; 1973 Nov; 62(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 11664277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Judicial decisions in civil commitment: facts, attitudes, and psychiatric recommendations. Hiday VA Law Soc Rev; 1983; 17(3):517-30. PubMed ID: 11658694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Civil commitment in Alabama. Segall RD Ala Law Rev; 1977; 26(1):215-71. PubMed ID: 11664721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill. Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment. Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]