These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658289)
1. The past and present of the right to treatment: a slogan gone astray. Slovenko R J Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(3):263-82. PubMed ID: 11658289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future. Wallach S Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question. Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The rights of the mentally ill under state constitutions. Meisel A Law Contemp Probl; 1982; 45(3):7-40. PubMed ID: 11645495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Open Sesame: the Constitution and mental institutions. Trotter RJ Sci News; 1975 Jul; 108(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 11664469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst. Ferleger D; Scott PM West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of the Burger Court: Part I. Parry J Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom. Concemi M Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Civil commitment of mentally ill--right to treatment--parens patriae power--right to liberty. Cooper GG Akron Law Rev; 1975; 9(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 11664558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients. Belzer I UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Due process--involuntary civil confinement: a right to rehabilitative treatment? Vermillion LJ ISL Law Rev; 1976; 1(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 11664678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal rights of the mentally impaired. Dowben C Houst Law Rev; 1979 May; 16(4):833-901. PubMed ID: 11651659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rights within the therapeutic relationship. King P J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients. Tenn Law Rev; 1976; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs. Hahn WA Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Substantive due process limits on the duration of civil commitment for the treatment of mental illness. Burgett DW Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1981; 16(1):205-64. PubMed ID: 11650560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment. Grant GM Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals. Anderson K Rev Law Soc Change; 1976; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]