307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658305)
1. Court bolsters mental patients' rights.
Herbert W
Sci News; 1982 Jun; 121(26):420. PubMed ID: 11658305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court.
Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. High court establishes rights for retarded in institutions.
Barbash F
Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():A1, A5. PubMed ID: 11647762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Romeo, Romeo, where art thou Romeo: before the court at the mercy of institutional professionals.
Meyer SM; Soskin RM
J Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(2):205-22. PubMed ID: 11658596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo.
Smith GG
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Youngberg v. Romeo: the right to treatment dilemma and the mentally retarded.
Gallo LV
Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):179-213. PubMed ID: 11658597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Youngberg v. Romeo.
U.S. Supreme Court
U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1982 Jun; 457():307-31. PubMed ID: 12041273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Granting rights to the retarded.
Will GF
Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():C7. PubMed ID: 11647763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look.
Malmquist CP
J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):137-64. PubMed ID: 11658821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal rights of the mentally impaired.
Dowben C
Houst Law Rev; 1979 May; 16(4):833-901. PubMed ID: 11651659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Romeo v. Youngberg.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1980 Nov; 644():147-86. PubMed ID: 11648465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Rennie v. Klein.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Fed Report; 1983 Oct; 720():266-77. PubMed ID: 11648483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cort RS
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs.
Hahn WA
Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
King P
J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mental commitment cases of the 1971-72 Supreme Court term.
Wing KR; Carman R
Clgh Rev; 1973 Mar; 6(11):659-62. PubMed ID: 11664360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Involuntary psychiatry.
Szasz TS
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1976; 45(3):347-65. PubMed ID: 11664781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Forced drug medication of involuntarily committed mental patients.
Blais NR
St Louis Univ Law J; 1975; 20(1):100-19. PubMed ID: 11664646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
Brooks AD
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
