These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658318)

  • 1. H.L. v. Matheson: where does the Court stand on abortion and parental notification?
    Feldman HN
    Am Univ Law Rev; 1982; 31(2):431-69. PubMed ID: 11658318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. H.L. v. Matheson: parental notice prior to abortion.
    Medler MA
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1982 Jan; 26(2):426-46. PubMed ID: 11655739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Court upholds parental notice requirement before allowing abortions on minors.
    Ewer PA
    J Crim Law Criminol; 1981; 72(4):1461-81. PubMed ID: 11649442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions.
    Wolff MH; Hawn RH
    Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Right to abortion limited: the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of parental notification statutes.
    Byrne TJ
    Loyola Law Rev; 1982; 28(1):281-96. PubMed ID: 11658437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parent versus child: H.L. v. Matheson and the new abortion litigation.
    Bridge B
    Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(1):75-116. PubMed ID: 11655605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
    Frame DW
    West VA Law Rev; 1983; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restrictions on the abortion rights of minors: Bellotti v. Baird.
    Harv Womens Law J; 1980; 3(1):119-39. PubMed ID: 11658352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power.
    Paul EW; Klassel D
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Constitutional law--a state statute, which requires physicians to notify the parents of immature and unemancipated minors before performing an abortion, does not violate the minors' fundamental right to have an abortion.
    Goranson MD
    Drake Law Rev; 1981-1982; 31(2):476-85. PubMed ID: 11658330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations.
    Baldwin ML
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High court upholds parents' rights in minor's abortion.
    Ob Gyn News; 1981 May; 16(9):2+. PubMed ID: 11665238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal.
    Lozano GD
    St Marys Law J; 1980; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Constitutional law--Supreme Court is undecided on parental notification requirement for minor's abortion.
    McArthur JR
    S C Law Rev; 1980 Feb; 31(3):604-16. PubMed ID: 11665169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
    Wardle LD
    Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future.
    Joseph MA
    New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Court upholds parental notice law in some abortions on minors.
    Barbash F
    Washington Post; 1981 Mar; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11647753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
    Heller S
    Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parental notification and public policy.
    Diamond EF
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 11656615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constitutional law -- Fifth Circuit holds that requiring the consent of both parents does not unduly burden a minor's right to abortion -- Barnes v. Mississippi.
    Jackson CP
    Temple Law Rev; 1994; 67(4):1357-86. PubMed ID: 11660074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.