These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658338)

  • 1. Court considers case on mentally retarded.
    Nations Health; 1981 Feb; 11(2):1, 8. PubMed ID: 11658338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1981 Apr; 451():1-55. PubMed ID: 12041272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1984 Jan; 465():89-167. PubMed ID: 12041274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mental health law--42 U.S.C. Section 6010 held not to create substantive rights in favor of mentally retarded: Pennhurst State School v. Halderman, 101 S.Ct. 1531 (1981).
    Calvey FL
    Marquette Law Rev; 1981; 65(1):156-66. PubMed ID: 11658449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Halderman v. Pennhurst State School and Hospital.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1979 Dec; 612():84-135. PubMed ID: 11648475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
    Ferleger D; Scott PM
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High court establishes rights for retarded in institutions.
    Barbash F
    Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():A1, A5. PubMed ID: 11647762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Granting rights to the retarded.
    Will GF
    Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():C7. PubMed ID: 11647763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The constitutional right to treatment services for the noncommitted mentally disabled.
    Esposito VM
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1980; 14(4):675-705. PubMed ID: 11651740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pennhurst, Romeo, and Rogers. The Burger Court and Mental Health Law Reform Litigation.
    Brant J
    J Leg Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):323-48. PubMed ID: 6605401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abandoned but not forgotten: the illegal confinement of elderly people in state psychiatric institutions.
    Kanter AS
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19():273-307. PubMed ID: 11659687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The sterilization of mentally retarded persons: the issues and conflicts.
    Paul EW
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1974 Oct; 3(5):96-9. PubMed ID: 11664325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Youngberg v. Romeo: the right to treatment dilemma and the mentally retarded.
    Gallo LV
    Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):179-213. PubMed ID: 11658597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Youngberg v. Romeo.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    U S Rep U S Supreme Court; 1982 Jun; 457():307-31. PubMed ID: 12041273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Romeo, Romeo, where art thou Romeo: before the court at the mercy of institutional professionals.
    Meyer SM; Soskin RM
    J Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(2):205-22. PubMed ID: 11658596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The conflict between "disabling" and "enabling" paradigms in law: sterilization, the developmentally disabled, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
    Dugan JC
    Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 78(3):507-42. PubMed ID: 11659683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo.
    Smith GG
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of a mentally ill individual's right to refuse medication under the United States and the New York State constitutions.
    Brooks WM
    Touro Law Rev; 1991; 8(1):1-54. PubMed ID: 11659527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sterilization of the retarded: a problem or a solution?
    Murdock CW
    Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):917-35. PubMed ID: 11663463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Postadmission due process for mentally ill and mentally retarded children after Parham v. J.R. and Secretary of Public Welfare v. Institutionalized Juveniles.
    Joseph BC
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1979; 29(1):129-57. PubMed ID: 11665106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.