BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658342)

  • 1. Due process and voluntary commitment by parents of juveniles to mental health facilities.
    Hodgeman RB
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1980; 49(1):259-69. PubMed ID: 11658342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constitutional law--Fourteenth Amendment--due process--civil commitment--mentally ill and retarded juveniles.
    Arena RM
    Duquesne Law Rev; 1980; 18(4):969-82. PubMed ID: 11658429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constitutional law--due process--minor child may be "voluntarily" committed to mental institution by parents or guardian following precommitment approval.
    Koller HM
    Villanova Law Rev; 1980 Mar; 25(3):537-50. PubMed ID: 11665273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constitutional law--due process--juveniles committed to state mental hospitals upon application of parents or guardians are not entitled to adversarial hearings.
    Secrest LF
    Emory Law J; 1980; 29(2):517-62. PubMed ID: 11665263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Due process rights of minors and parental authority in civil commitment cases.
    Gartin E
    Mercer Law Rev; 1980; 31(2):617-25. PubMed ID: 11661876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Due process for minors "voluntarily" committed to mental institutions: does father know best? Recommendations for Illinois.
    Gifford M
    South Ill Univ Law J; 1980; 1980(2):171-97. PubMed ID: 12083084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power, uncertainty, and choice: the voluntary commitment of children--Parham v. J.L.
    Simet DP
    Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1982 May; 20(1):141-61. PubMed ID: 11658705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment of children by parents--Parham v. J.R.
    Citarella KC
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(4):1001-25. PubMed ID: 11658638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Institutionalization of juveniles: what process is due? Parham v. J.R.
    Herbsleb J
    Neb Law Rev; 1980; 59(1):190-213. PubMed ID: 11658460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Constitutional collision course: family autonomy and the rights of minors in voluntary commitment proceedings.
    Gallion T
    LA Law Rev; 1980; 40(4):985-97. PubMed ID: 11660933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A chance to be heard: an application of Bellotti v. Baird to the civil commitment of minors.
    Butler KA
    Hastings Law J; 1981 May; 32(5):1285-318. PubMed ID: 11658348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can parents "volunteer" their children into mental institutions: an analysis of Kremens v. Bartley and Parham v. J.L. and J.R.
    Ment Retard Law; 1978 Jan; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 11686183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Involuntary civil commitment: the inadequacy of existing procedural and substantive protections.
    Matteson K
    UCLA Law Rev; 1981 Apr; 28(4):906-51. PubMed ID: 11658605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. parham v. J.R. and Secretary of Public Welfare v. Institutionalized Juveniles: civil commitments and the balance of authority between child, parent, and state.
    Martin CA
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1980 Jan; 7(1):158-69. PubMed ID: 11660936
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?
    Zenoff EH; Zients AB
    George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Due process in the "voluntary" civil commitment of juvenile wards.
    Glaessner PO
    J Leg Med; 1981 Jun; 2(2):169-92. PubMed ID: 6972431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postadmission due process for mentally ill and mentally retarded children after Parham v. J.R. and Secretary of Public Welfare v. Institutionalized Juveniles.
    Joseph BC
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1979; 29(1):129-57. PubMed ID: 11665106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parental power in the voluntary commitment of children to mental institutions.
    Riggert BA
    Washburn Law J; 1978; 17(3):595-614. PubMed ID: 11662571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Post-Parham remedies: the involuntary commitment of minors in Virginia after Parham v. J.R.
    Spaulding WJ
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):695-741. PubMed ID: 11665159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parents, children and the Supreme Court.
    Ford MD
    Commonweal; 1979 Aug; 106(14):462-5. PubMed ID: 11653415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.