243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658344)
1. The war on cancer.
Hawkins P
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Oct; 127(148):S11610-8. PubMed ID: 11658344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent: the FDA's perspective.
Bagley G
Food Drug Law J; 1993; 48(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 11653141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
van Eys J; Levine RJ
IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research.
Jellinek MS; Levine RJ
IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Annual review: observed deficiencies and suggested corrections.
Adams MS; Conrad DA
IRB; 1996; 18(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11654743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Protection of human subjects.
United States
Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Food and Drug Administration's role in the protection of human subjects.
Nightingale SL
IRB; 1983; 5(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11649511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
Kobasic DM
J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A look at the bioresearch monitoring program: the agency perspective.
Brisson EL
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1983 Apr; 38(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 11649578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The FDA's enforcement of IRBs and patient informed consent.
Kelsey FO
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Jan; 44(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11651627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Report says institutional review boards are conducting inadequate reviews.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1998 Sep; 13(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 11660603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. FDA revises informed consent regulations for emergency research.
Menasché A; Levine RJ
IRB; 1995; 17(5-6):19-22. PubMed ID: 11653359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An even safer safety net.
Prentice E
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):46. PubMed ID: 11644996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical and psychological experimentation on California prisoners.
Herch F; Flower R
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():351-84. PubMed ID: 11661107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. IRBs and epidemiologic research: how inappropriate restrictions hamper studies.
Cann CI; Rothman KJ
IRB; 1984; 6(4):5-7. PubMed ID: 11649562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulation of clinical research: who's protecting who from what?
Petricciani JC
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1979 Apr; 34(4):205-7. PubMed ID: 11661718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An overview of FDA, IRBs and regulations.
Petricciani JC
IRB; 1981 Dec; 3(10):1-3, 11. PubMed ID: 11649413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Is this a job for the IRB? The case of the ELISA assay.
Holder AR
IRB; 1985; 7(6):7-8. PubMed ID: 11649689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Federal report says protection of human subjects is threatened by numerous factors.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 May; 11(5):1-3. PubMed ID: 11654438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reviewing subject recruitment: new rules from Rockville.
McMahon FG
IRB; 1988; 10(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 11651911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
