These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Attitudes toward the use of deception in psychologically induced pain. Lustig BA; Coverdale J; Bayer T; Chiang E IRB; 1993; 15(6):6-8. PubMed ID: 11654097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The informed consent dilemma: an empirical approach. Michaels TF; Oetting ER J Soc Psychol; 1979 Dec; 109(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 11665208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the ethics of ethics research: a case study. Miller FG; Wendler D IRB; 2004; 26(2):9-12. PubMed ID: 15069971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The ethics of open methods. Homan R Br J Sociol; 1992 Sep; 43(3):321-32. PubMed ID: 11660181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Deception in medical and behavioral research: is it ever acceptable? Wendler D Milbank Q; 1996; 74(1):87-114. PubMed ID: 8596525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent: I. The institutional non-liability clause as a liability in recruiting research subjects. Trice AD; Ogden EP J Soc Behav Pers; 1986; 1(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 11659090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How (un)acceptable is research involving deception? Smith CP IRB; 1981 Oct; 3(8):1-4. PubMed ID: 11650527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Withdrawing data as a substitute for consent. Freedman B; Sieber JE IRB; 1983; 5(6):10-1. PubMed ID: 11649527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Deception and the placebo effect in biomedical research. Connelly RJ IRB; 1987; 9(4):5-7. PubMed ID: 11649948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Coparticipant effects on subjects' decisions to consent for risk-involving research. Finney PD J Soc Psychol; 1984 Oct; 124(First half):35-41. PubMed ID: 11653799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhancing comprehension of information for informed consent: a review of empirical research. Silva MC; Sorrell JM IRB; 1988; 10(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11658988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward an informed discussion of informed consent: a review and critique of the empirical studies. Meisel A; Roth LH Ariz Law Rev; 1983; 25(2):265-346. PubMed ID: 11658677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Information for consent in human experimentation. Dickens BM Univ Tor Law J; 1974; 24(4):381-410. PubMed ID: 11664387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Participants' understanding of the process of psychological research: informed consent. Brody JL; Gluck JP; Aragon AS Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(4):285-98. PubMed ID: 11655335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The requirement for informed consent in research on human subjects: the problem of the uncontrolled consequences of health-related research. Makarushka JL Clin Res; 1976 Feb; 24(2):64-7. PubMed ID: 10236180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics code spells disaster for Canadian psychologists. Concar D New Sci; 1996 Dec; 152(2059):7. PubMed ID: 11656574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. AIDS prevention among IV drug users: potential conflicts between research design and ethics. Des Jarlais DC; Friedman SR IRB; 1987; 9(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 11649891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Deception in social research II: evaluating the potential for harm or wrong. Sieber JE IRB; 1983; 5(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Do ethically recommended research procedures influence the perceived ethicality of social psychological research? Lindsay RC; Adair JG Can J Behav Sci; 1990 Jul; 22(3):282-94. PubMed ID: 11659568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]