These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule. Karlson HC; Erwin RD Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Consent to medical treatment in Canada. Picard EI Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical responsibility in the Libyan law. Benomran FA Med Law Int; 1994; 1(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 11652959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Autonomy and privacy: protecting patients from their physicians. Bobinski MA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(2):291-388. PubMed ID: 11659957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent. Halligan PD LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana. Boland GL LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent: defining limits through therapeutic parameters. Daar JF Whittier Law Rev; 1995; 16(1):187-209. PubMed ID: 11660487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Health care information technology and informed consent: computers and the doctor-patient relationship. Miller FH Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(4):1019-42. PubMed ID: 11660668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Scarce resource allocation decisions: issues of physician conflict and liability. Shaul RZ; Mendelssohn DC Hum Health Care Int; 1997; 13(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 11656899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes. Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost containment and the standard of medical care. Morreim EH Calif Law Rev; 1987 Oct; 75(5):1719-63. PubMed ID: 11659107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent and the danger of bias in the formation of medical disclosure practices. Schneyer TJ Wis L Rev; 1976; 1976(1):124-70. PubMed ID: 11664629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability. Wallach DM; Berry SJ St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The performance of invasive procedures by HIV-infected doctors: the duty to disclose under the informed consent doctrine. DeBarge MW Conn Law Rev; 1993; 25(3):991-1025. PubMed ID: 11659692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Commentary on "Patients as 'subjects' or 'objects'. Edwards WS J Clin Ethics; 1991; 2(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 11642914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patients' rights and informed consent: an emergency case for hospitals? Callan DE Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 12(2):406-28. PubMed ID: 11664656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed refusal. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 166. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]. Committee on Professional Liability ACOG Comm Opin; 1995 Dec; No. 166():2 p. PubMed ID: 11660328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis. Monks SS Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]