These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658421)

  • 1. Freedom and insanity.
    Alexander GJ
    Metamedicine; 1982 Oct; 3(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 11658421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
    King P
    J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient advocacy in psychiatry: the Austrian and the Dutch models.
    Forster R
    Int Soc Work; 1998 Apr; 41(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 11660656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill.
    Fields JD
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supreme Court rules against involuntary custodial confinement of the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1975 Sep; 26(9):616+. PubMed ID: 11643281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ulysses and the psychiatrists: a legal and policy analysis of the voluntary commitment contract.
    Dresser RS
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1982; 16(3):777-854. PubMed ID: 11659391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Involuntary psychiatry.
    Szasz TS
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1976; 45(3):347-65. PubMed ID: 11664781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In the name of treatment: autonomy, civil commitment, and right to refuse treatment.
    Schwartz BM
    Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Jun; 50(5):808-42. PubMed ID: 11664466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs.
    Hahn WA
    Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informed consent to organic behavior control.
    Barnhart BA; Pinkerton ML; Roth RT
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1977; 17(1):39-83. PubMed ID: 11664710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lessard v. Schmidt: due process and involuntary civil commitment.
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(3):585-642. PubMed ID: 11664292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.
    Concemi M
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Without more": a constitutional right to treatment?
    Lipscomb NI
    Loyola Law Rev; 1975 Winter 1975; 22(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 11664670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Autonomy for vulnerable populations: the Supreme Court's reckless disregard for self-determination and social science.
    Bersoff DN
    Villanova Law Rev; 1992; 37(6):1569-605. PubMed ID: 11654411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constitutional law--confinement of nondangerous mentally ill capable of surviving safely in freedom held to violate patient's right to "liberty".
    Hancock GC
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 11664793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look.
    Malmquist CP
    J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):137-64. PubMed ID: 11658821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
    Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mental commitment cases of the 1971-72 Supreme Court term.
    Wing KR; Carman R
    Clgh Rev; 1973 Mar; 6(11):659-62. PubMed ID: 11664360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson: a reply to Bernard.
    Siegel RA
    Am Psychol; 1978 Sep; 33(9):858-61. PubMed ID: 11643479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
    Grant GM
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.