These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658421)
1. Freedom and insanity. Alexander GJ Metamedicine; 1982 Oct; 3(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 11658421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Rights within the therapeutic relationship. King P J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient advocacy in psychiatry: the Austrian and the Dutch models. Forster R Int Soc Work; 1998 Apr; 41(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 11660656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill. Fields JD Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Supreme Court rules against involuntary custodial confinement of the nondangerous mentally ill. Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1975 Sep; 26(9):616+. PubMed ID: 11643281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ulysses and the psychiatrists: a legal and policy analysis of the voluntary commitment contract. Dresser RS Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1982; 16(3):777-854. PubMed ID: 11659391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In the name of treatment: autonomy, civil commitment, and right to refuse treatment. Schwartz BM Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Jun; 50(5):808-42. PubMed ID: 11664466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs. Hahn WA Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent to organic behavior control. Barnhart BA; Pinkerton ML; Roth RT Santa Clara Law Rev; 1977; 17(1):39-83. PubMed ID: 11664710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Lessard v. Schmidt: due process and involuntary civil commitment. Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(3):585-642. PubMed ID: 11664292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom. Concemi M Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. "Without more": a constitutional right to treatment? Lipscomb NI Loyola Law Rev; 1975 Winter 1975; 22(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 11664670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Autonomy for vulnerable populations: the Supreme Court's reckless disregard for self-determination and social science. Bersoff DN Villanova Law Rev; 1992; 37(6):1569-605. PubMed ID: 11654411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Constitutional law--confinement of nondangerous mentally ill capable of surviving safely in freedom held to violate patient's right to "liberty". Hancock GC Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 11664793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look. Malmquist CP J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):137-64. PubMed ID: 11658821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values. Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mental commitment cases of the 1971-72 Supreme Court term. Wing KR; Carman R Clgh Rev; 1973 Mar; 6(11):659-62. PubMed ID: 11664360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson: a reply to Bernard. Siegel RA Am Psychol; 1978 Sep; 33(9):858-61. PubMed ID: 11643479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment. Grant GM Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]