254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658447)
1. Constitutional law--Maryland circuit courts have parens patriae jurisdiction to authorize guardians to consent to sterilization of incompetent minors when the procedure is medically necessary.
Eisner LJ
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1982; 11(3):467-75. PubMed ID: 11658447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Exclusive juvenile jurisdiction to authorize sterilization of incompetent minors.
Bays-Beinart DJ
Indiana Law Rev; 1983; 16(4):835-60. PubMed ID: 11658574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A parent's right to seek sterilization for an incompetent minor.
Barron EJ
Forum; 1981; 16(5):1081-101. PubMed ID: 11649450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Protection of reproductive rights.
Utah
Utah Code Annot 1953 Utah; 1983; Sections 64.10.1 to 64.10.16():. PubMed ID: 12043639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In re Grady--voluntary sterilization and the retarded.
Denkin JF
Rutgers Law Rev; 1982; 34(3):567-90. PubMed ID: 11658757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sterilization of the mentally retarded minor: the Re K. case.
Finch-Noyes CA
Can J Fam Law; 1986; 5(1):277-99. PubMed ID: 11659190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The sterilization rights of mental retardates.
Munro AB
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1982; 39(1):207-21. PubMed ID: 11658661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Voluntary sterilization for persons with mental disabilities: the need for legislation.
Burnett BA
Syracuse Law Rev; 1981; 32(4):913-55. PubMed ID: 11658516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Eve decision -- a common law perspective.
Keyserlingk EW
Rev Gen Droit; 1987; 18(3):657-75. PubMed ID: 11659379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Virginia's sterilization law: what should be done about it?
Hall SC
Va Bar News; 1980 Apr; 28(10):17-21. PubMed ID: 11658468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Voluntary sterilization of the non-institutionalized mentally incompetent individual: judicial involvement or abstention?
Sachs LB
New Engl Law Rev; 1981-1982; 17(2):527-47. PubMed ID: 11658327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Wentzel v. Montgomery General Hospital, Inc.
Maryland. Court of Appeals
Atl Report; 1982 Jul; 447():1244-64. PubMed ID: 11648524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sterilization of the mentally retarded: who decides?
Lottman MS
Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):61-64, 77-78. PubMed ID: 11649515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comments on the sterilization of mental incompetents in Canadian civil and common law.
Kouri RP; Somerville MA
Rev Droit; 1980; 10(2):599-628. PubMed ID: 11651751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Constitutional law: substantive due process and the incompetent organ donor.
Morris JR
Oklahoma Law Rev; 1980; 33(1):126-39. PubMed ID: 11663091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sterilization case has become fight over rights of retarded.
Goldberg D
Washington Post; 1994 Nov; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Guardianship of Matejski.
Iowa. Supreme Court
Wests North West Rep; 1988 Feb; 419():576-82. PubMed ID: 12041141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Addressing the consent issue involved in the sterilization of mentally incompetent females.
Davis DD
Albany Law Rev; 1979; 43(2):322-38. PubMed ID: 11665120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Consent to medical procedures and the Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988.
Grant E
Otago Law Rev; 1989; 7(1):161-78. PubMed ID: 11659272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Balancing the right of the mentally retarded to obtain a therapeutic sterilization against the potential for abuse.
Irvine AC
Law Psychol Rev; 1988; 12():95-122. PubMed ID: 11660733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
