These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

672 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658459)

  • 1. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family.
    Baron CH
    Fam Law Q; 1983; 17(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 11658459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Living-will statutes: a minor oversight.
    Hawkins LA
    Va Law Rev; 1992 Oct; 78(7):1581-615. PubMed ID: 11659663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The roles of the family in making health care decisions for incompetent patients.
    Francis LP
    Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):861-90. PubMed ID: 11656535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bioethics and the family: the cautionary view from family law.
    Schneider CE
    Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):819-47. PubMed ID: 11656533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Life and death decisions: who makes them and by what standards?
    Pollock SG
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):505-40. PubMed ID: 11649262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state.
    Morgan R; Harty-Golder B
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1988; 23(4):721-65. PubMed ID: 11652556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Falling off the vine: legal fictions and the doctrine of substituted judgment.
    Harmon L
    Yale Law J; 1990 Oct; 100(1):1-71. PubMed ID: 11659389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
    Richard SM
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical treatment for minor children: the roles of parents, the state, the child, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
    Crutchfield CF
    Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 11651710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
    Rubin BL
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A patient's last rights: termination of medical care--an analysis of New York's In re Storar.
    Day K
    Albany Law Rev; 1982; 46(4):1380-413. PubMed ID: 11658533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Right to die" cases: a model for judicial decision-making?
    Webster WL
    N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1990; 7(2):140-56. PubMed ID: 11652592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
    Buchanan AE
    UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar.
    Williams SE
    Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minors, medical treatment, and interspousal disagreement: should Solomon split the child?
    Feigenbaum MS
    De Paul Law Rev; 1992; 41(3):841-84. PubMed ID: 11659593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Liability for improper maintenance of life support: balancing patient and physician autonomy.
    Addlestone SI
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 1993 Oct; 46(5):1255-81. PubMed ID: 11653092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The values history: a new standard of care.
    Rich BA
    Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1109-81. PubMed ID: 11652633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
    Brant J
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of minors in health care decision making: current legal issues.
    Waxse DJ
    Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(4):17-21. PubMed ID: 11654286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis.
    Krasik EB
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.