BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

562 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658462)

  • 1. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal.
    Lozano GD
    St Marys Law J; 1980; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future.
    Joseph MA
    New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
    Pirner RK; Williams LB
    Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
    Frame DW
    West VA Law Rev; 1983; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constitutional law -- Fifth Circuit holds that requiring the consent of both parents does not unduly burden a minor's right to abortion -- Barnes v. Mississippi.
    Jackson CP
    Temple Law Rev; 1994; 67(4):1357-86. PubMed ID: 11660074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Easing restrictions on minors' abortion rights.
    O'Keeffe J; Jones JM
    Issues Sci Technol; 1990; 7(4):74-80. PubMed ID: 11659333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test.
    Farber DA; Nowak JE
    Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions.
    Wolff MH; Hawn RH
    Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion--an update.
    Guthman HL
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):175-91. PubMed ID: 11649201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Constitutional law--a minor's abortion right under a parental notice statute.
    Czarnecki MS
    Wayne Law Rev; 1982; 28(4):1901-28. PubMed ID: 11658440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Constitution and the anomaly of the pregnant teenager.
    Buchanan E
    Ariz Law Rev; 1982; 24(3):553-610. PubMed ID: 11658425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power.
    Paul EW; Klassel D
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
    Wardle LD
    Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
    Embree MG; Dobson TA
    Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
    Prall S
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Restrictions on the abortion rights of minors: Bellotti v. Baird.
    Harv Womens Law J; 1980; 3(1):119-39. PubMed ID: 11658352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The judicial portrayal of the physician in abortion and sterilization decisions: the use and abuse of medical discretion.
    Asaro A
    Harv Womens Law J; 1983; 6(1):51-102. PubMed ID: 11658431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When is a pregnant minor mature? When is an abortion in her best interests? The Ohio Supreme Court applies Ohio's Abortion Parental Notification Law: In re Jane Doe 1.
    Stuhlbarg SF
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1992; 60(3):907-61. PubMed ID: 11651633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations.
    Baldwin ML
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.