140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658467)
1. Informed consent in Pennsylvania--the need for a negligence standard.
Heckert L
Villanova Law Rev; 1982 Nov; 28(1):149-72. PubMed ID: 11658467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent.
Halligan PD
LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule.
Karlson HC; Erwin RD
Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.
Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ
Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Following doctors' orders: informed consent in Australia.
Manderson D
Aust Law J; 1988 Jun; 62(6):430-40. PubMed ID: 11659118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 'Informed consent' to medical procedures.
Skegg PD
Med Sci Law; 1975; 15(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 11693128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent.
Horan DJ; Halligan P
Linacre Q; 1982 Nov; 49(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 11649603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability.
Wallach DM; Berry SJ
St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Consent to medical treatment in Canada.
Picard EI
Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis.
Monks SS
Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana.
Boland GL
LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent liability.
Recher BC
Drake Law Rev; 1976; 26(3):696-715. PubMed ID: 11664787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent and malpractice jeopardy: practical aspects.
Alsobrook HB
Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(3):ORL277-81. PubMed ID: 11664753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of the Texas Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act on informed consent recovery in medical malpractice litigation.
Elliott FW
Tex Tech Law Rev; 1979; 10(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 11665221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent.
Grubbs WG
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent: looking for the action.
Riskin LL
Univ Ill Law Forum; 1975; 1975(4):580-611. PubMed ID: 11664566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The growing importance of informed consent.
Beloud RG
Calyx; 1973 Winter 1973; 13(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 11664370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Oh, didn't I tell you? A look at informed consent.
Greenwald AE
Trial; 1982 Jun; 18(6):54-56, 85. PubMed ID: 11658483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Strict liability and informed consent: "Don't say I didn't tell you so!
Maldonado JE
Akron Law Rev; 1976; 9(4):609-28. PubMed ID: 11664618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent.
Penhallegon JR
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]