These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658467)
21. Informed consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act. Rosen MW Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):701-27. PubMed ID: 11664598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas. Cluff CA Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 11655722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Informed consent in Kentucky after the Medical Malpractice Insurance and Claims Act of 1976. Curtis JV KY Law J; 1976; 65():524-40. PubMed ID: 11664783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Patients' rights and informed consent: an emergency case for hospitals? Callan DE Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 12(2):406-28. PubMed ID: 11664656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed. Kessenick LW; Mankin PA Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Malpractice: questions of consent in connection with treatment of genital or urinary organs. Frantz LB Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1979; 89():32-77. PubMed ID: 12091927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The doctrine of informed consent. Stewart T Insur Couns J; 1976 Jan; 43(1):118-34. PubMed ID: 11664632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Patient consent in Louisiana. Dewey EP Loyola Law Rev; 1981; 27(4):1166-83. PubMed ID: 11658777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Malpractice risk assessment among different approaches for informed consent. Sato RL; Yamamoto LG; Li GG Hawaii Med J; 2000 Sep; 59(9):357-61. PubMed ID: 11055115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Professional liability--what's new? Bull Am Coll Surg; 1974 May; 59(5):15-20. PubMed ID: 11664342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Amniocentesis in medicine and law: practice standards and legal ramifications. Fineberg KS; Peters JD Trial; 1984 Feb; 20(2):54-56, 58-59. PubMed ID: 11658749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Informed refusal. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 166. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]. Committee on Professional Liability ACOG Comm Opin; 1995 Dec; No. 166():2 p. PubMed ID: 11660328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Changes in "informed consent". Rubsamen DS Med World News; 1973 Feb; 14(6):66-7. PubMed ID: 11662038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system. Deardorff SE Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical risks, patients' rights, and the inadequacies of the negligence action. Martin R Hong Kong Law J; 1985 May; 15(2):150-66. PubMed ID: 11658882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Tort law--informed consent to medical treatment: a case of medical negligence. Gaughran N Dubl Univ Law J; 1997; (19):178-97. PubMed ID: 12449972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Health care information technology and informed consent: computers and the doctor-patient relationship. Miller FH Indiana Law Rev; 1998; 31(4):1019-42. PubMed ID: 11660668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]