414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658496)
1. IVF--in vitro fertilization.
Kieffer GH
Am Biol Teach; 1980 Apr; 42(4):211-218, 231. PubMed ID: 11658496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. What should we do with surplus potential humans?
Annas GJ
Washington Post; 1985 Mar; ():K1, K5. PubMed ID: 11647789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.
American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee
Fertil Steril; 1990 Jun; 53(6) Suppl. 2):i-1S-109S. PubMed ID: 11659223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.
American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee
Fertil Steril; 1986 Sep; 46(3) Suppl. 1):1S-94S. PubMed ID: 11658710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Lack of federal funds, oversight for IVF and embryo transfer focus of congressional hearing.
Med World News; 1984 Sep; 25(17):67, 71. PubMed ID: 11645527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproductive help: widespread and unregulated.
Gleick J
N Y Times Web; 1987 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11646511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The wisdom of repugnance: why we should ban the cloning of humans.
Kass LR
New Repub; 1997 Jun; 216(22):17-26. PubMed ID: 11654974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Federal embryo research is backed: ethicists see benefits overriding qualms.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Techniques of Assisted Reproduction: Act 35/1988.
Spain
Bol Of Estado Gac Madr Spain; 1988 Nov; No. 282():. PubMed ID: 12041504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Intimations of life: extracorporeality and the law.
Smith GP
Gonzaga Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(2):395-424. PubMed ID: 11658788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States.
Stenger RL
J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Government seeks views on 'test-tube' babies.
Vines G
New Sci; 1986 Dec; 112(1539):3. PubMed ID: 11658779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Law for protection of embryos.
Germany
Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: medical technology + social values = legislative solutions.
Milich MF
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(4):875-901. PubMed ID: 11652196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Babies in limbo: law outpaced by fertility advances.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1998 Feb; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In Britain and Australia, new in vitro guidelines.
Levine C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Feb; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 11643983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Liberty and assisted reproduction.
Robertson JA
Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):48-53. PubMed ID: 11654494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. At the vortex of controversy: developing guidelines for human embryo research.
Green RM
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1994 Dec; 4(4):345-56. PubMed ID: 11645283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990.
Great Britain
Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Nov; No. 63():13-21. PubMed ID: 11651088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice.
Schenker JG; Frenkel DA
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
