These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658496)
21. The ethics of human manufacture. Krauthammer C New Repub; 1987 May; 196(18):17-21. PubMed ID: 11658978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Ethics and new reproductive technologies: an international review of committee statements. Walters L Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S3-9. PubMed ID: 11644029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Law No. 35/1988 of 22 Nov 1988 on Assisted Reproduction Procedures (BoletÃn Oficial del Estado, 24 Nov 1988, No. 282, pp. 33373-33378). Spain Int Dig Health Legis; 1989; 40(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 11659178 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The Human Cloning Prohibition Act: did Congress go too far? Cannon J; Haas M Harvard J Legis; 1998; 35(2):637-45. PubMed ID: 11660809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Prisoners of progress or hostages to fortune? Morgan D; Nielsen L J Law Med Ethics; 1993; 21(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 11652120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The week in Plymouth: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6487):72-3. PubMed ID: 11652446 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Report on human cloning through embryo splitting: an amber light. National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction (NABER) Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1994 Sep; 4(3):251-82. PubMed ID: 11645281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Priest JA Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The human preembryo, the progenitors, and the state: toward a dynamic theory of status, rights, and research policy. Martin PA; Lagod ML High Technol Law J; 1990; 5(2):257-310. PubMed ID: 11659412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Regulating research: a tale of two technologies. Zallen DT Technol Soc; 1989; 11(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 11651309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Rules and ethics concerning assisted procreation established by the government in Germany. Krebs D J Assist Reprod Genet; 1996 Mar; 13(3):193-5. PubMed ID: 11644839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Rules due on disputed embryo research. Angier N N Y Times Web; 1994 Sep; ():C1, C10. PubMed ID: 11647977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In-vitro fertilization (IVF), embryo transfer (ET) and assisted reproduction in the State of Israel. Schenker JG Hum Reprod; 1987 Nov; 2(8):755-8. PubMed ID: 11644108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Assisted reproductive technology and the family. Robertson JA Hastings Law J; 1996 Apr; 47(4):911-33. PubMed ID: 11656838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Assisted noncoital reproduction: a comparative analysis. Smith GP Boston Univ Int Law J; 1990; 8(1):21-52. PubMed ID: 11659376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Council agrees response to Warnock report. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6463):255-6. PubMed ID: 11658545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Infertility Treatment Act 1995. No. 63 of 1995. Date of assent: 27 Jun 1995. Australia. Victoria Int Dig Health Legis; 1997; 48(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 11656775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Reproductive technology: in Australia, the debate moves to embryo experimentation. Waller L Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S21-2. PubMed ID: 11644025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Canada calls for moratorium on IVF technologies. Kondro W Lancet; 1995 Aug; 346(8971):367. PubMed ID: 11653127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]