146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658528)
1. The "psychiatric will" debate: illogic and hidden agendas.
Vatz RE; Weinberg LS
J Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):361-70. PubMed ID: 11658528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ulysses and the psychiatrists: a legal and policy analysis of the voluntary commitment contract.
Dresser RS
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1982; 16(3):777-854. PubMed ID: 11659391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Advance directive instruments for those with mental illness.
Winick BJ
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1996 Oct; 51(1):57-95. PubMed ID: 11660621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bound to freedom: the Ulysses contract and the psychiatric will.
Macklin A
Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1987; 45(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11659143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The continuum of coercion: constitutional and clinical considerations in the treatment of mentally disordered persons.
Miller RD
Denver Univ Law Rev; 1997; 74(4):1169-214. PubMed ID: 11660618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ulysses contracts.
Lavin M
J Appl Philos; 1986 Mar; 3(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 11658829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. On the right of "nondangerous" incompetent patients to leave psychiatric units against medical advice.
DeGrazia D
Contemp Philos; 1992 Sep; 14(5):1-5. PubMed ID: 11660299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A proposal for the use of advance directives in the treatment of incompetent mentally ill persons.
Brock DW
Bioethics; 1993 Apr; 7(2-3):247-56. PubMed ID: 11651538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advance directives for psychiatric treatment.
Appelbaum PS
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1991 Oct; 42(10):983-4. PubMed ID: 1959908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Competence to refuse medical treatment: autonomy vs. paternalism.
Annas GJ; Densberger JE
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):561-96. PubMed ID: 11649779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The right to refuse treatment in Quebec.
Morrison D
Health Law Can; 1985; 5():65-8. PubMed ID: 11660312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sequential domination, autonomy and living wills.
Johnson SH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):113-37. PubMed ID: 11649909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Advance directives for psychiatric treatment: a view from the trenches.
Miller RD
Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):728-45. PubMed ID: 12807097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hospitalized psychiatric patients' resistance to routine medical care.
Eilers R
Adm Policy Ment Health; 1994 May; 21(5):407-15. PubMed ID: 11660614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Civil commitment of the mentally ill: compelling arguments for reform.
Price DP
Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(3):321-52. PubMed ID: 11657030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Food for thought: Dresser on anorexia.
Fost N
Wis L Rev; 1984; 1984(2):375-84. PubMed ID: 11653755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical, ethical and legal considerations of electroconvulsive therapy.
MacDonald RP
Osgoode Hall Law J; 1984; 22(4):683-710. PubMed ID: 11658852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Feeding the hunger artists: legal issues in treating anorexia nervosa.
Dresser R
Wis L Rev; 1984; 1984(2):297-374. PubMed ID: 11653754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The substituted judgment approach: its difficulties and paradoxes in mental health settings.
Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
Law Med Health Care; 1985 Apr; 13(2):61-4. PubMed ID: 11643871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Shulman case and the right to refuse treatment.
Sneiderman B
Humane Med; 1991; 7(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 11651301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
