289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658529)
1. U.S. rules hurt fertilization research.
Krieger L
Am Med News; 1984 Oct; 27(37):14. PubMed ID: 11658529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Lack of federal funds, oversight for IVF and embryo transfer focus of congressional hearing.
Med World News; 1984 Sep; 25(17):67, 71. PubMed ID: 11645527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. 'Govt. block of fetal research set back in-vitro work 5 years.
Kubetin WR
Ob Gyn News; 1984 Mar 15-31; 19(6):1, 38. PubMed ID: 11647773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rules due on disputed embryo research.
Angier N
N Y Times Web; 1994 Sep; ():C1, C10. PubMed ID: 11647977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A survey of the legal, ethical, and public policy considerations of in vitro fertilization.
McCartan MK
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):695-731. PubMed ID: 11650889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What should we do with surplus potential humans?
Annas GJ
Washington Post; 1985 Mar; ():K1, K5. PubMed ID: 11647789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The brave new world of biomedical research.
Coste C
New Physician; 1977 Jul; 26(7):18-22. PubMed ID: 11663036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Federal embryo research is backed: ethicists see benefits overriding qualms.
Weiss R
Washington Post; 1999 May; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11648116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Embryo research.
Lynch R;
Origins; 1994 Dec; 24(27):462. PubMed ID: 11659915
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cloning: where do we draw the line?
Elmer-Dewitt P
Time; 1993 Nov; 142(19):65-70. PubMed ID: 11645239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Research on embryonic tissue, ethics, and congressional inquiry.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1999 Jan; 14(1):6. PubMed ID: 11657559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. National Biomedical Research Fellowship, Traineeship, and Training Act of 1973.
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 May; 119(82):H4164-79. PubMed ID: 11663376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Test-tube baby study debated by HEW panel.
Cohn V
Washington Post; 1979 Feb; ():A7. PubMed ID: 11649155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproductive help: widespread and unregulated.
Gleick J
N Y Times Web; 1987 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11646511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Misapplied ethical considerations: U.S. federal stem cell mandates lack global focus and market foresight.
Fowler HL
Cornell Int Law J; 2004; 36(3):521-44. PubMed ID: 16602208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose rights?
Schmaus W; Wigodsky HS
IRB; 1984; 6(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 11650663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Test tube babies: the quandaries of creation.
Futurist; 1979 Dec; 13(6):487-8. PubMed ID: 11662006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hatch on hatcheries.
Hatch O
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1979 Dec; 125(184):S19525-33. PubMed ID: 11663207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The inhuman use of human beings: a statement on embryo research.
Ramsey Colloquium
First Things; 1995 Jan; 49():17-21. PubMed ID: 11659886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Destroying human embryos for research.
National Catholic Bioethics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
Ethics Medics; 2000 Mar; 25(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12201302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
