152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658543)
1. Withholding treatment: reflections on the Dawson case.
Browne A
Can Fam Physician; 1983 Aug; 29():1413-4. PubMed ID: 11658543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-treatment in the best interests of the child: a case commentary of Couture-Jacquet v. Montreal Children's Hospital.
Keyserlingk EW
McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):413-36. PubMed ID: 11649873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner.
Bates KW
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
Brant J
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical issues in pediatric anesthesia.
Truog RD; Rockoff MA
Semin Anesth; 1991 Sep; 10(3):187-94. PubMed ID: 11651358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
Corbett KA; Raciti RM
New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The case of Phillip Becker.
Destro RA; Moeller WA
Hum Life Rev; 1980; 6(4):81-98. PubMed ID: 11664107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical issues in pediatric surgery: a national survey of pediatricians and pediatric surgeons.
Shaw A; Randolph JG; Manard B
Pediatrics; 1977 Oct; 60(4-Part 2):588-99. PubMed ID: 11664868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis.
Krasik EB
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria?
Longino PH
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Family law--guardians of incompetent persons can refuse life-prolonging treatment for their wards.
Gilman GS
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1978; 12(4):1039-57. PubMed ID: 11662777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Indiana's new health care consent act: a guiding light for the health care provider.
Thompson WH
Indiana Law Rev; 1988; 21(1):181-203. PubMed ID: 11659030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I.
Hodgman DR; Frazer QR
Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The right to consent and the right to refuse: more problems with minors and medical consent.
Edwards L
Jurid Rev; 1993 Jan; Part 1():52-73. PubMed ID: 11659661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Just what the doctor ordered: the role of unconventional therapy in the treatment of cancer in minors.
Grumet BR
Fam Law Q; 1980; 14(2):63-98. PubMed ID: 11665187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A doctor's and parent's dilemma: sterilisation of the intellectually disabled.
Monahan P
Law Inst J; 1991 Aug; 65(8):712-3. PubMed ID: 11659485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Elin Daniels case: an examination of the legal, medical, and ethical considerations posed when parents and doctors disagree on whether to treat a defective newborn.
Portela C
Forum; 1983; 18(4):709-27. PubMed ID: 11658577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Preserving the life of children.
Louisiana
Revis Statut La; 1982; Title 40 Sections 1299.36.1 to 1299.36.3():. PubMed ID: 12041499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Atlanta court bars efforts to end life support for stricken girl, 13.
Smothers R
N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A new 'right-to-life' battleground opens over mentally retarded child.
Cannon L
Washington Post; 1979 Jul; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
