These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658551)

  • 1. Scientific research must have a moral basis.
    Warnock M
    New Sci; 1984 Nov; 104(1430):36. PubMed ID: 11658551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lords oppose embryo research.
    New Sci; 1984 Nov; 104(1429):6. PubMed ID: 11655672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. House of Commons votes for ban on embryo research.
    Med World News; 1985 Apr; 26(7):30. PubMed ID: 11649605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Embryonic research.
    New Sci; 1984 Sep; 103(1423):2. PubMed ID: 11658549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why Warnock's 14-day rule may be unworkable.
    Connor S
    New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):6. PubMed ID: 11658553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time to break down taboos about infertility.
    Templeton AA
    New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):39. PubMed ID: 11658552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New conception threatened by old morality.
    Sattaur O
    New Sci; 1984 Sep; 103(1423):12-7. PubMed ID: 11658548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Government seeks views on 'test-tube' babies.
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1986 Dec; 112(1539):3. PubMed ID: 11658779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The week in Plymouth:
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6487):72-3. PubMed ID: 11652446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why experiment on human embryos?
    Vines G
    New Sci; 1989 Nov; 124(1689):48-50. PubMed ID: 11659163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The start of a long debate on the Warnock report.
    Deitch R
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238. PubMed ID: 11644288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Moral thinking and government policy: the Warnock Committee on Human Embryology.
    Warnock M
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(3):504-22. PubMed ID: 3852077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research and the embryo.
    Huxley A
    New Sci; 1985 Apr; 106(1451):2. PubMed ID: 11658554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Commons debates Warnock report.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Dec; 289(6458):1639. PubMed ID: 11652438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 -- a British case history for legislation on bioethical issues.
    Bolton V; Osborn J; Servante D
    J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 11651386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lords worry over Warnock.
    Russell W
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Nov; 289(6454):1321. PubMed ID: 11653633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Warnock fuels debate over 14-day rule.
    New Sci; 1984 Jul; 103(1414):3-4. PubMed ID: 11658480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Embryo research: British Commons vote for ban.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Feb; 313(6004):618. PubMed ID: 11658513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Powell bites dust: the British government needs to think hard about surrogacy.
    Nature; 1985 Apr; 314(6012):568. PubMed ID: 11658566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. New techniques in the field of human fertilization and embryology.
    Council of Europe. Parliamentary Assembly
    Hum Reprod; 1986 Jun; 1(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 11643963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.