204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658565)
1. Infanticide and its apologists.
Tedeschi M
Commentary; 1984 Nov; 78(5):31-5. PubMed ID: 11658565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
Horan DJ; Balch BJ
Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The future of Baby Doe.
Singer P; Kuhse H
New York Rev Books; 1984 Mar; 31(3):17-22. PubMed ID: 11658414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe.
McFadden JP; Hentoff N
Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The legislative response to Infant Doe.
Kuzma AL
Indiana Law J; 1983-1984; 59(3):377-416. PubMed ID: 11658614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The ultimate parental nightmare: should our 'bad baby' live or die?
Lyon J
Washington Post; 1985 Feb; ():C1, C2. PubMed ID: 11646289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Life and death and the handicapped newborn.
Koop CE
Ethics Med; 1987; 3(3):39-44. PubMed ID: 11651893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Law, medicine, and morality: the cases of Infant Doe and Pamela Hamilton.
Klinefelter D
J Law Relig; 1984; 2(2):413-27. PubMed ID: 11651848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of life, sanctity of creation: palliative or apotheosis?
Smith GP
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):709-40. PubMed ID: 11652479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Discrimination and Baby Jane.
Will GF
Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A23. PubMed ID: 11646274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Baby Jane.
Cohen R
Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():B1. PubMed ID: 11646270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Baby Jane Doe: readers' responses.
Marzen TJ; Uddo BJ
America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):93-4. PubMed ID: 11658403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Should every Baby Doe die?
Barringer F
Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():B5. PubMed ID: 11646281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Baby Jane Doe: the ethical issues.
Conley JJ
America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):84-9. PubMed ID: 11658402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Decision to pursue Baby Doe case born in confusion at HHS.
Barringer F
Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Judge rejects U.S. role in 'Baby Doe' case.
Barringer F
Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A33. PubMed ID: 11646343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Meese approved intervention in baby case.
Barringer F
Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11646345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The legacy of Infant Doe.
Cosby MG
Bayl Law Rev; 1982; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Refusal of lifesaving treatment for minors.
Annas GJ
J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(2):217-40. PubMed ID: 11651846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond state intervention in the family: for Baby Jane Doe.
Minow M
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985; 18(4):933-1014. PubMed ID: 11655183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
