BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658570)

  • 1. Treatment without consent: intervention by the court.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 May; 290(6479):1409-10. PubMed ID: 11658570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical treatment for minor children: the roles of parents, the state, the child, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
    Crutchfield CF
    Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 11651710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority.
    Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1984 Nov 19-Dec 20 (date of decision); 1985(1):533-59. PubMed ID: 11648530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Limiting Gillick.
    Douglas G
    Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Feb; No. 75():34-5. PubMed ID: 11651271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re D (A Minor) (Wardship:Sterilisation).
    Great Britain. England. High Court of Justice, Family Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1975 Sep; 1976():326-36. PubMed ID: 11648637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Teenage confidence and consent.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6462):144-5. PubMed ID: 3917719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment and minors: issues not involving lifesaving treatment.
    King PA
    J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(2):241-65. PubMed ID: 11658744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family.
    Baron CH
    Fam Law Q; 1983; 17(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 11658459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sterilisation and the courts.
    Grubb A; Pearl D
    Camb Law J; 1987 Nov; 46(3):439-64. PubMed ID: 11659062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re B (A Minor) (Wardship: Sterilisation).
    Great Britain. House of Lords (30 Apr 1987) [and] Court of Appeal, Civil Div. (16 Mar 1987) [and] Family Div. at Newcastle Upon Tyne (20 Jan 1987)
    All Engl Law Rep; 1987 Apr; [1987]2():206-19. PubMed ID: 11648560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The right to consent and the right to refuse: more problems with minors and medical consent.
    Edwards L
    Jurid Rev; 1993 Jan; Part 1():52-73. PubMed ID: 11659661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Taking a lesson from England: the contraceptive controversy.
    Mitchell MJ
    Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1987; 9(2):499-522. PubMed ID: 11658961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Righting a child's right to refuse medical treatment: Section 11 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act and the Gillick competent child.
    Austin G
    Otago Law Rev; 1992; 7(4):578-96. PubMed ID: 11659776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Constitutional law--Maryland circuit courts have parens patriae jurisdiction to authorize guardians to consent to sterilization of incompetent minors when the procedure is medically necessary.
    Eisner LJ
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1982; 11(3):467-75. PubMed ID: 11658447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The judicial portrayal of the physician in abortion and sterilization decisions: the use and abuse of medical discretion.
    Asaro A
    Harv Womens Law J; 1983; 6(1):51-102. PubMed ID: 11658431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Gillick saga The Gillick saga -- II.
    Williams G
    New Law J; 1985 Nov 22-29; 135(6230 and 6231):1156-1158, 1179-1182. PubMed ID: 11660424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concern at Gillick judgment.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6464):336. PubMed ID: 11652426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minors and mental incompetents: consent to experimentation, gifts of tissue and sterilization.
    Bowker WF
    McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):951-77. PubMed ID: 11650595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Re Eve.
    Canada. Supreme Court
    Dom Law Rep; 1986 Oct; 31():1-37. PubMed ID: 12041087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Professional confidence in relation to young persons who seek treatment concerning pregnancy or contraceptive advice.
    Great Britain. General Medical Council
    Lancet; 1985 Feb; 1(8426):470. PubMed ID: 11644443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.