These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658579)
21. The great 'recombinant DNA' controversy and the need for public debate. Pearson M Sci Forum; 1977 Jun; 10(3):3-4+. PubMed ID: 11650574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Patenting animals and other living things. O'Connor KW South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):597-621. PubMed ID: 11645846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The potential for genetic engineering: a proposal for international legal control. Gardner BJ VA J Int Law; 1976; 16(2):403-29. PubMed ID: 11661343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The regulation of recombinant DNA research: the alternative of local control. Rosenblatt DP Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1982; 10(1):37-78. PubMed ID: 11649694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Recombinant DNA and the law: review of some general legal considerations. Korwek EL Gene; 1981; 15():1-5. PubMed ID: 11658461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Controlling creation: what's at stake in genetic engineering. Bengelsdorf IS Am Med News; 1977 Nov; 20(47):Impact 3-4. PubMed ID: 11661513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Federal Law of 5 June 1996 on state regulation in the field of genetic engineering activities. Russian Federation Int Dig Health Legis; 1998; 49(3):529-32. PubMed ID: 11657542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Proposal for a coordinated framework for regulation of biotechnology. U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy Fed Regist; 1984 Dec; 49(252):50856-907. PubMed ID: 11655658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Patenting of life forms. Pautler G Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):47-50, 76. PubMed ID: 11649513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. International and European regulation of recombinant DNA research. Tooze J Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):869-90. PubMed ID: 11649589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Biological defense defended. Norman C Science; 1988 May; 240(4855):981. PubMed ID: 11644306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. European biologists endorse US genetic research curbs. Norman C Sci Gov Rep; 1976 Mar; 6(4):3. PubMed ID: 11661415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Japanese regulation of recombinant DNA activities. Henderson DF Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):891-901. PubMed ID: 11649590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Molecular politics in a global economy. Wright S Politics Life Sci; 1996 Sep; 15(2):249-63. PubMed ID: 11654797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Designer genes that don't fit: a tort regime for commercial releases of genetic engineering products. Harv Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 100(5):1086-105. PubMed ID: 11658845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. History feeds German fears on gene technology. Zell R New Sci; 1989 Aug; 123(1679):26-7. PubMed ID: 11659160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Will the USSR take genes to war? Joyce C New Sci; 1984 May; 102(1412):9. PubMed ID: 11655610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Medical experiments and the new law: in vitro fertilisation procedures, embryo experimentation and the law. Bravender-Coyle P Law Inst J; 1985; 59(1-2):63-7. PubMed ID: 12083090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. US biological weapons: new test facility defended. Palca J Nature; 1986 Jun; 321(6073):805. PubMed ID: 11645772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Europe fails to agree on biotech rules. Conzelmann C; Claveloux D New Sci; 1986 Jul; 111(1516):19-20. PubMed ID: 11655773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]