These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658615)

  • 1. Great expectations or convoluted realities: artificial insemination in flux.
    Smith GP
    Fam Law Rev; 1980; 3():37-44. PubMed ID: 11658615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A medical advancement in search of a legal theory--artificial insemination by donor and the law.
    Baylson MM
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1987 Feb; 5(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 11658912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
    Lorio KV
    LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The "legitimization" of artificial insemination: promise or problem?
    Knoppers BM
    Fam Law Rev; 1978 Apr; 1(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 11664957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The judicial aspects of artificial insemination.
    Strasberg-Cohen T
    Med Law; 1982 Jun; 1(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 11649658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
    Abbas J
    Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Draft ABA Model Surrogacy Act.
    American Bar Association. Section of Family Law, Adoption Committee, and Ad Hoc Surrogacy Committee
    Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):123-43. PubMed ID: 11659040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Civil law regulation of reproductive technologies: new laws for the new biology?
    Bercovitch J
    Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):385-406. PubMed ID: 11651095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A legal perspective on artificial insemination.
    Castillo DG
    Philipp Law J; 1976; 51(1-2):142-63. PubMed ID: 11664986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered?
    Lieber KB
    Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artificial insemination and the law.
    Jensen BJ
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(4):935-90. PubMed ID: 11658495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Infertility and sterility: legal implications of artificial conception.
    Palm MT; Hirsh HL
    Med Law; 1982 Jun; 1(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 11649656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artificial insemination of human beings.
    Council of Europe
    Med Law; 1982 Jun; 1(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 11649654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial insemination by donor: information, communication and regulation.
    Gibson EL
    J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 11659440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidentiality and American semen donors.
    Karow AM
    Int J Fertil; 1993; 38(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 11659706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial insemination.
    Sagall EL
    Trial; 1973; 9(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 11664272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Legal aspects of artificial insemination.
    Shaman JM
    J Fam Law; 1979; 18(2):331-51. PubMed ID: 11665122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The rights of the biological father: from adoption and custody to surrogate motherhood.
    Stanton ER
    Vt Law Rev; 1987; 12(1):87-121. PubMed ID: 11658956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The regulation of sperm banks and fertility doctors: a cry for prophylactic measures.
    Fracassini AL
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():275-307. PubMed ID: 11645740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should parents be notified of their minor daughter's abortion? A pregnant question for Florida legislators.
    Parsons CE
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1986; 14(3):719-43. PubMed ID: 11658962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.