231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658619)
1. Informed refusal: an unnecessary burden on physicians?
Shank S
UMKC Law Rev; 1981; 49(3):365-76. PubMed ID: 11658619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas.
Cluff CA
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 11655722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. From informed consent to a duty to convince: Truman v. Thomas.
Beller RL
Houst Law Rev; 1981 May; 18(4):917-30. PubMed ID: 11649420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent for the terminal patient.
Rutledge TA
Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 11660876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent: risk disclosure and the Canadian approach.
Jazvac WP
Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1978; 36(2):191-208. PubMed ID: 11664977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical malpractice: informed consent cases in "full-disclosure" jurisdictions.
Seidelson DE
Duquesne Law Rev; 1976; 14(3):309-47. PubMed ID: 11664631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative study of the law relating to the physician's duty to obtain the patient's "informed consent" to medical treatment in England and California.
Churchward AB
Conn J Int Law; 1990; 5(2):483-563. PubMed ID: 11659375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. From informed consent to patient choice: a new protected interest.
Shultz MM
Yale Law J; 1985 Dec; 95(2):219-99. PubMed ID: 11658859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The expansion of liability for medical accidents: from negligence to strict liability by way of informed consent.
Meisel A
Neb Law Rev; 1977; 56(1):51-152. PubMed ID: 11664804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent and the material risk standard: a modest proposal.
Morton JE
Pac Law J; 1981 Jul; 12(4):915-36. PubMed ID: 11658351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent after Cobbs--has the patient been forgotten?
Bamberg DF
San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 10(4):913-27. PubMed ID: 11661027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent: alternatives for Illinois.
Holmstrom JT
Univ Ill Law Forum; 1973; 1973(4):739-56. PubMed ID: 11664278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Public psychiatry and the right to refuse treatment: toward an effective damage remedy.
Furrow BR
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1984; 19(1):21-60. PubMed ID: 11658667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Pap smears: physicians must disclose risk of refusal.
Annas GJ
Nurs Law Ethics; 1981 Jan; 2(1):3. PubMed ID: 12085919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent: the three tests and a modest proposal for the reality of the patient as an individual.
Trichter JG; Lewis PW
South Tex Law J; 1981; 21(2):155-70. PubMed ID: 11658706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patients, agents, and informed consent.
Haber JG
J Law Health; 1985-1986; 1():43-59.. PubMed ID: 11658933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The evolution of the doctrine of informed consent.
Georgia Law Rev; 1978; 12(3):581-611. PubMed ID: 11664967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Who's afraid of informed consent? An affirmative approach to the medical malpractice crisis.
Fierstein RK
Brooklyn Law Rev; 1978; 44(2):241-84. PubMed ID: 11661552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent--a proposed standard for medical disclosure.
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 48(3):548-63. PubMed ID: 11664279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hard choices: patient autonomy in an era of health care cost containment.
Gregory MR
Jurimetrics; 1990; 30(4):483-500. PubMed ID: 11651275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
