129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658623)
1. The impact of clients' rights legislation on hospital staff.
Ostrander SA
Adm Ment Health; 1982; 9(4):257-71. PubMed ID: 11658623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Rone v. Fireman.
U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D
Fed Suppl; 1979 Jun; 473():92-135. PubMed ID: 11648522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. E.H. v. Matin.
West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals
South East Report Second Ser; 1981 Nov; 284():232-41. PubMed ID: 12041312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The new Ohio Mental Health Act.
Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ
Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Attitudes toward mental patients' rights: program models and the ideology of nurses.
Ziegenfuss JT; Lasky DI
J Psychiatry Law; 1986; 14(3-4):469-78. PubMed ID: 11658885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
Miller HL
Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The limits of liberty: deinstitutionalization, homelessness, and libertarian theory.
Rhoden NK
Emory Law J; 1982; 31(2):375-440. PubMed ID: 11653485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mental patients in Soviet to get new legal rights.
Keller B
N Y Times Web; 1988 Jan; ():A1, A11. PubMed ID: 11647834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Davis v. Hubbard.
U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio, W.D
Fed Suppl; 1980 Sep; 506():915-44. PubMed ID: 11648474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. On the emancipation of mental patients.
Slovenko R; Luby ED
J Psychiatry Law; 1975; 3(2):191-213. PubMed ID: 11664507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Institutionalizing the rights of mental patients: committing the legislature.
Morris GH
Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):957-1024. PubMed ID: 11663464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The rights of the mentally ill during incarceration: the developing law.
Rastatter PC
Univ Fla Law Rev; 1973; 25(3):494-520. PubMed ID: 11664236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. To stay at home: analysis of rights and recommendations on procedures for persons receiving mental health services in the community.
Lowder JL; Hickman FJ
J Law Health; 1992-1993; 7(2):219-51. PubMed ID: 11652820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Hospitalized mentally ill polled on family planning.
Ob Gyn News; 1982 Jul 15-31; 17(14):44. PubMed ID: 11653497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Guaranteeing the right to treatment.
Hoffman PB; Dunn RC
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):7-11+. PubMed ID: 11662297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Realism in mental health law reform: the 1987 amendments to the Japanese mental health law.
Harding TW
Int Dig Health Legis; 1989; 40(1):254-60. PubMed ID: 11659175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Civil commitment decisionmaking: a report on one decisionmaker's experience.
Morris GH
South Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jan; 61(2):291-351. PubMed ID: 11659028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Power, professionals, and arguments against civil commitment.
Page S
Prof Psychol; 1975 Nov; 6(4):381-93. PubMed ID: 11664528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
