630 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658624)
1. Consent to medical treatment in Canada.
Picard EI
Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana.
Boland GL
LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent.
Halligan PD
LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis.
Monks SS
Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.
Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ
Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Structuring the issues in informed consent.
Somerville MA
McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):740-808. PubMed ID: 11650591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system.
Deardorff SE
Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent.
Grubbs WG
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent.
Horan DJ; Halligan P
Linacre Q; 1982 Nov; 49(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 11649603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule.
Karlson HC; Erwin RD
Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient participation in medical decision-making: are the courts the answer?
Bromberger B
Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11649729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent: the three tests and a modest proposal for the reality of the patient as an individual.
Trichter JG; Lewis PW
South Tex Law J; 1981; 21(2):155-70. PubMed ID: 11658706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Informing patients about medical risks.
Texas Medical Disclosure Panel
Tex Med; 1982 Mar; 78(3):36-9. PubMed ID: 11643732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient consent in Louisiana.
Dewey EP
Loyola Law Rev; 1981; 27(4):1166-83. PubMed ID: 11658777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent and the danger of bias in the formation of medical disclosure practices.
Schneyer TJ
Wis L Rev; 1976; 1976(1):124-70. PubMed ID: 11664629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability.
Wallach DM; Berry SJ
St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical decision-making: patient participation.
Wolfgarten A; Khan A
Med Leg J; 1984; 52(Pt. 3):180-90. PubMed ID: 11649586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Responsibility and accountability in provider-patient relationships.
Blumstein JF
Circulation; 1982 Nov; 66(Suppl. III):91-9. PubMed ID: 11658401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The meaning of informed consent.
Whitfield A
Med Leg J; 1986; 54(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 11653740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Consent to medical procedures: paternalism, self-determination or therapeutic alliance?
Teff H
Law Q Rev; 1985 Jul; 101():432-53. PubMed ID: 11658726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
