500 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658651)
1. Legal aspects of artificial human reproduction: can the law afford to play ostrich?
Clapshaw D
Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 4(3):254-72. PubMed ID: 11658651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
Lorio KV
LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial conception: legislative approaches.
Krause HD
Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
;
Fam Law Rep (Wash D C); 1989 Feb; 15(16):2009-16. PubMed ID: 11659181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
Abbas J
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy.
Hofheimer A
Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law.
Wadlington W
Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges.
Capron AM
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificially assisted conception.
Long LL
Health Law Can; 1985; 5(4):89-107. PubMed ID: 11645666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Egg donation, motherhood and state law reform: a commentary on Professor Palmer's proposals.
Strouse DS
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 11660335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Embryos, families, and procreative liberty: the legal structure of the new reproduction.
Robertson JA
South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):939-1041. PubMed ID: 11655852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Conceiving for cash; is it legal?: a survey of the laws applicable to surrogate motherhood.
Taylor S
N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1987; 4(Part 2):413-44. PubMed ID: 11650203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice.
Schenker JG; Frenkel DA
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial reproduction and child custody.
Dickens BM
Can Bar Rev; 1987 Mar; 66(1):49-75. PubMed ID: 11658911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Whose child is it anyway?
Platt EF
Med Leg J; 1994; 62 ( Pt 4)():180-97. PubMed ID: 7845312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Austria: a legal ban on surrogate mothers and fathers?
Bernat E; Straka U
J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Spring; 31(2):267-82. PubMed ID: 11660068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Who are the parents of biotechnological children?
Palmer LI
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Normative regulation of reproductive technologies in Israel.
Shapira A
Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):609-24. PubMed ID: 11650355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In-vitro fertilization (IVF), embryo transfer (ET) and assisted reproduction in the State of Israel.
Schenker JG
Hum Reprod; 1987 Nov; 2(8):755-8. PubMed ID: 11644108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Surrogate mother agreements: contemporary legal aspects of a biblical notion.
Townsend MD
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1982; 16(2):467-83. PubMed ID: 11658708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
