313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658669)
1. Caring or starving? The case of Claire Conroy.
McCormick RA
America (NY); 1985 Apr; 152(13):269-73. PubMed ID: 11658669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Withholding food and water from a patient--should it be condoned in California?
Harber SM
Pac Law J; 1985 Apr; 16(3):877-93. PubMed ID: 11652432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients.
Cantor NL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1985; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
Jarrett C
Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live".
Kamisar Y
Georgia Law Rev; 1991; 25(5):1203-42. PubMed ID: 11652581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nutritional discontinuation: active or passive euthanasia?
Banja JD
J Neurosurg Nurs; 1990 Apr; 22(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 11659424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections.
Kadish SH
Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In re Conroy.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division
Atl Report; 1983 Jul; 464():303-15. PubMed ID: 11648239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In re Conroy.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Chancery Division, Essex County
Atl Report; 1983 Feb; 457():1232-7. PubMed ID: 11648154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In the matter of Claire Conroy.
Connery JR
Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 11651840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In re Quinlan: one step further.
Ek GK
Houst Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 24(2):383-98. PubMed ID: 11649893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
Richard SM
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Conroy: forging a path to death with dignity.
Agrawal A
Boston Univ Law Rev; 1987 Mar; 67(2):365-89. PubMed ID: 11649960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Matter of Conroy.
New Jersey. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1985 Jan; 486():1209-50. PubMed ID: 11648233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In re Drabick.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11644377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Nancy Cruzan case.
McCormick RA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1989; 5(1-2):2-31. PubMed ID: 12091960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonfeeding: lawful killing in CA, homicide in NJ.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Dec; 13(6):19-20. PubMed ID: 11644094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
Johnson SH
St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience.
Weinberg JK
Hastings Law J; 1988 Nov; 40(1):119-67. PubMed ID: 11659106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey.
Rust M
Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
