These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658692)

  • 1. DHSS's revised guidance on contraceptive services for young people.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Mar; 292(6522):782. PubMed ID: 11658692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A disturbing judgment by the Court of Appeal.
    Lancet; 1985 Jan; 1(8419):24-5. PubMed ID: 11644441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parents, doctors and children: the Gillick case and beyond.
    De Cruz SP
    J Soc Welfare Law; 1987 Mar; ():93-108. PubMed ID: 11658930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Gillick saga The Gillick saga -- II.
    Williams G
    New Law J; 1985 Nov 22-29; 135(6230 and 6231):1156-1158, 1179-1182. PubMed ID: 11660424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Request to GMC to reconsider guidance on contraception and the under 16s.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Apr; 292(6525):966-7. PubMed ID: 11652459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Under-age contraception--whose responsibility?
    S Afr Med J; 1983 Oct; 64(16):603-4. PubMed ID: 11644057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Professional confidence in relation to young persons who seek treatment concerning pregnancy or contraceptive advice.
    Great Britain. General Medical Council
    Lancet; 1985 Feb; 1(8426):470. PubMed ID: 11644443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Confidentiality and young people.
    Gillick V
    Ethics Med; 1988; 4(2):21-3. PubMed ID: 11659097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority.
    Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division
    All Engl Law Rep; 1984 Nov 19-Dec 20 (date of decision); 1985(1):533-59. PubMed ID: 11648530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contraception and the under-16s.
    Lancet; 1985 Apr; 1(8432):827. PubMed ID: 11644482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Taking a lesson from England: the contraceptive controversy.
    Mitchell MJ
    Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1987; 9(2):499-522. PubMed ID: 11658961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GMC asked to reconsider advice on confidentiality and the under 16s.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Mar; 292(6522):778-9. PubMed ID: 11658691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concern at Gillick judgment.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6464):336. PubMed ID: 11652426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Teenagers and contraception.
    Ritchie S; Jessiman IM; Mills A
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Mar; 292(6521):696-7. PubMed ID: 11658698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Further thoughts on Mrs. Gillick's case.
    Wells W
    Lancet; 1985 Nov; 2(8464):1138-9. PubMed ID: 11644491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. BMA comments on Gillick judgment.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Oct; 291(6503):1209. PubMed ID: 11653679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GMC's revised guidance.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Feb; 292(6519):570. PubMed ID: 11652455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Teenage confidence and consent.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6462):144-5. PubMed ID: 3917719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The doctor and the underage girl.
    Slack K
    Christ Century; 1985 Feb; 102(6):174-6. PubMed ID: 11653712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Annual report of Council, 1986-1987: medical ethics.
    British Medical Association
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 Mar; 294(6575):suppl 28-30. PubMed ID: 11652496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.