These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658717)

  • 21. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: the duty to warn--common law and statutory problems for California psychotherapists.
    Cohen RN
    Calif West Law Rev; 1978; 14(1):153-82. PubMed ID: 11664959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Eavesdropping on the 50-minute hour: managed mental health care and confidentiality.
    Corcoran K; Winslade WJ
    Behav Sci Law; 1994; 12():351-65. PubMed ID: 11660198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perspectives on patient confidentiality in the age of AIDS.
    Goode JS
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1993; 44(3):967-1001. PubMed ID: 11660175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Constitutional law--right of privacy--evidence law of privileges--the patient-litigant exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Christensen EL
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1977 Jun; 10(3):695-708. PubMed ID: 11664857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The origins of the physician-patient privilege and professional secret.
    Shuman DW
    Southwest Law J; 1985 Jun; 39(2):661-87. PubMed ID: 11660419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The limits of constitutional privacy in the psychotherapist-patient evidentiary privilege.
    Maly B
    Gold Gate Law Rev; 1977; 8(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 11661694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Notifying husbands about an abortion: an empirical look at constitutional and policy dilemmas.
    Plutzer E; Ryan B
    Sociol Soc Res; 1987 Apr; 71(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 11659056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Privileged communications for psychotherapists in Pennsylvania: a time for statutory reform.
    Knapp SJ; VandeCreek L; Zirkel PA
    Temple Law Q; 1987; 60(2):267-92. PubMed ID: 11658934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Patient-psychotherapist privilege: access to clinical records in the tangled web of repressed memory litigation.
    Loftus EF; Paddock JR; Guernsey TF
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1996 Jan; 30(1):109-54. PubMed ID: 11656851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Legislative control of shock treatment.
    Moore E
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1975; 9(4):738-77. PubMed ID: 11664532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Behind closed doors: the confidentiality of psychotherapeutic records in Medicaid fraud investigations.
    Bassano PN
    Pace Law Rev; 1986; 6(3):441-94. PubMed ID: 11649846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. I shot the sheriff, but only my analyst knows: shrinking the psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Domb B
    J Law Health; 1990-1991; 5(2):209-36. PubMed ID: 11651189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Tarasoff, myth and reality: an empirical study of private law in action.
    Givelber DJ; Bowers WJ; Blitch CL
    Wis L Rev; 1984; 1984(2):443-97. PubMed ID: 11653756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Access to medical and psychiatric records: proposed legislation.
    Felch E
    Albany Law Rev; 1976; 40(3):580-617. PubMed ID: 11664692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
    Brooks AD
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Treatment rights of mentally ill nursing home residents.
    Barnett CF
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1978 Jan; 126(3):578-629. PubMed ID: 11664875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Empirical support for the United States Supreme Court's protection of the psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Marsh JE
    Ethics Behav; 2003; 13(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 15000103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
    Belzer I
    UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The regulation of electroconvulsive therapy in California: the impact of recent constitutional interpretations.
    Whitcomb D
    Gold Gate Law Rev; 1989; 18(2):469-94. PubMed ID: 11659134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Physician-patient privilege: the physician-patient privilege does not apply in involuntary commitment proceedings which determine whether further treatment is needed... In re R., 97 Wn.2d 182, 641 P.2d 704 (1982).
    Christensen DS
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1983; 18(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 11658655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.