762 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658752)
1. Artificial conception: legislative approaches.
Krause HD
Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law.
Wadlington W
Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice.
Schenker JG; Frenkel DA
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation.
Lorio KV
LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Model human reproduction technologies and surrogacy act.
Abbas J
Iowa Law Rev; 1987 May; 72(4):943-1013. PubMed ID: 11659499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Legislative guidelines to govern in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.
Williams HE
Santa Clara Law Rev; 1986; 26(2):495-518. PubMed ID: 11651873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Conceiving for cash; is it legal?: a survey of the laws applicable to surrogate motherhood.
Taylor S
N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1987; 4(Part 2):413-44. PubMed ID: 11650203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Who are the parents of biotechnological children?
Palmer LI
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11660334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Normative regulation of reproductive technologies in Israel.
Shapira A
Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):609-24. PubMed ID: 11650355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues.
Field M
Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The itinerant embryo and the neo-nativity scene: bifurcating biological maternity.
O'Brien S
Utah Law Rev; 1987; 1987-1(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Law No. 35/1988 of 22 Nov 1988 on Assisted Reproduction Procedures (BoletÃn Oficial del Estado, 24 Nov 1988, No. 282, pp. 33373-33378).
Spain
Int Dig Health Legis; 1989; 40(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 11659178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Alternative birth technologies: legal challenges.
Capron AM
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):679-704. PubMed ID: 11659041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial insemination and the law.
Jensen BJ
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(4):935-90. PubMed ID: 11658495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal aspects of artificial human reproduction: can the law afford to play ostrich?
Clapshaw D
Auckl Univ Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 4(3):254-72. PubMed ID: 11658651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The new Spanish law: a model for Europe?
Varela MJ; Stolcke V
Reprod Genet Eng; 1989; 2(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 11652006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Intimations of life: extracorporeality and the law.
Smith GP
Gonzaga Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(2):395-424. PubMed ID: 11658788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The surrogate mother--a growing problem.
Sappideen C
Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):79-102. PubMed ID: 11649732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New innovations in conception and their effects upon our law and morality.
Shapiro ED
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1986; 31(1):37-59. PubMed ID: 11658943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
;
Fam Law Rep (Wash D C); 1989 Feb; 15(16):2009-16. PubMed ID: 11659181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
