762 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658752)
21. Fetus in Germany: the Fetus Protection Law of 12.13.1990.
Deutsch E
J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 11651385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The stork market: the law of the new reproduction technologies.
Andrews LB
ABA J; 1984 Aug; 70(8):50-6. PubMed ID: 11658526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Selling the womb: can the feminist critique of surrogacy be answered?
Lieber KB
Indiana Law J; 1992; 68(1):205-32. PubMed ID: 11659688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Gestational surrogacy: unsettling state parentage law and surrogacy policy.
Hofheimer A
Rev Law Soc Change; 1992; 19(3):571-616. PubMed ID: 11659977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Law for protection of embryos.
Germany
Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Austrian law on procreative medicine.
Morgan D; Bernat E
Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Nov; No. 83():13-6. PubMed ID: 11651517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro fertilization: eliminating the current state of limbo between pre-embryonic rights and the fundamental right to procreate.
Langley DB
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1991; 26(4):1217-43. PubMed ID: 11659618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Surrogate motherhood and the baby-selling laws.
Katz A
Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1986; 20(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11658800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The evolution of laws surrounding in vitro fertilization.
Andrews LB
Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1990 Nov; 8(4):296-303. PubMed ID: 11659385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Techniques of Assisted Reproduction: Act 35/1988.
Spain
Bol Of Estado Gac Madr Spain; 1988 Nov; No. 282():. PubMed ID: 12041504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Test tube babies: legal issues raised by in vitro fertilization.
Flannery DM
Georgetown Law J; 1979 Aug; 67(6):1295-345. PubMed ID: 11664058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A rejoinder.
Palmer LI
Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 11660336
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Embryos, families, and procreative liberty: the legal structure of the new reproduction.
Robertson JA
South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):939-1041. PubMed ID: 11655852
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies: a critique of the final report.
Shanner L
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1994 Mar; 27(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 11659921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Surrogacy arrangements and the conflict of laws.
Appleton SF
Wis L Rev; 1990; 1990(2):399-482. PubMed ID: 11652060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Reproductive technology: in Israel, law, religious orthodoxy, and reproductive technologies.
Shapira A
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S12-4. PubMed ID: 11644021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ethical considerations of the new reproductive technologies.
American Fertility Society. Ethics Committee
Fertil Steril; 1990 Jun; 53(6) Suppl. 2):i-1S-109S. PubMed ID: 11659223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Through her I too shall bear a child: birth surrogates in Jewish law.
Spitz E
J Relig Ethics; 1996; 24(1):65-97. PubMed ID: 11660204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Sexuality, privacy and the new biology.
Smith GP; Iraola R
Marquette Law Rev; 1984; 67(2):263-91. PubMed ID: 11658703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Reproductive technology: in Australia, the debate moves to embryo experimentation.
Waller L
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S21-2. PubMed ID: 11644025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
