396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658767)
1. Hospice: the legal ramification of a place to die.
Kuzma AL
Indiana Law J; 1981; 56(4):673-702. PubMed ID: 11658767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Living wills in the United States and Canada: a comparative analysis.
Steinle SJ
Case West Reserve J Int Law; 1992; 24(2):435-73. PubMed ID: 11652678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. "Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment": a critique.
Williams JR
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1984 Nov; 17(7):589-91. PubMed ID: 11651758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system.
Deardorff SE
Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to natural death.
Dickens BM
McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):847-79. PubMed ID: 11650592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Terminal care document.
Vermont
Vt Statut Annot Vt; 1981; Title 18 Chapter 111 Sections 5251 to 5262():. PubMed ID: 12041405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A new form of medical malpractice?: Missouri's "living will" statute.
Murphy RE
J Mo Bar; 1986; 42(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 11649874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection.
Smith SR
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural death.
Wisconsin
Wis Sess Laws Wis; 1984; ():. PubMed ID: 12038387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical problems in living will legislation.
Hughes R
J Relig Aging; 1988; 5(1-2):35-50. PubMed ID: 11652837
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology.
Hyland WF; Baime DS
Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Proposed state euthanasia statutes: a philosophical and legal analysis.
Kapner E
Hofstra Law Rev; 1975; 3(3):115-40. PubMed ID: 11661928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Euthanasia: the right to be 'let' alone.
Hill RE
South Univ Law Rev; 1980; 7(1):101-12. PubMed ID: 11649557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Living will statutes: a proposal for Kentucky.
Landers MC
KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(2):395-418. PubMed ID: 11649956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Last rights: Oregon's new Death with Dignity Act.
Graham KT
Willamette Law Rev; 1995; 31(3):601-46. PubMed ID: 11660301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act: too little, too late?
Chapman MA
Ark Law Rev; 1989; 42(2):319-94. PubMed ID: 11653880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospice: an alternative treatment of care for the terminally ill.
Hagerman AS
Pace Law Rev; 1988; 8(1):115-57. PubMed ID: 11650171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Euthanasia: criminal, tort, constitutional and legislative considerations.
Baughman WH; Bruha JC; Gould FJ
Notre Dame Lawyer; 1973 Jun; 48(5):1203-60. PubMed ID: 11664190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Indiana's Living Wills and Life-Prolonging Procedures Act: a reform proposal.
Mooney CA
Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(2):539-58. PubMed ID: 11649962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal perceptions and medical decision making.
Kapp MB; Lo B
Milbank Q; 1986; 64(Suppl. 2):163-202. PubMed ID: 11649883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
