157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658769)
1. Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study. Part One.
Robertson G
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1985 Jan; 18(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11658769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study. Part Two.
Robertson G
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1985 Mar; 18(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11658805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Consent to medical treatment in Canada.
Picard EI
Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informing patients about medical risks.
Texas Medical Disclosure Panel
Tex Med; 1982 Mar; 78(3):36-9. PubMed ID: 11643732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.
Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ
Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana.
Boland GL
LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed decision making: CMA policy summary.
Canadian Medical Association
CMAJ; 1986 Nov; 135(10):1208A-B. PubMed ID: 11658851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis.
Monks SS
Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legislating for an informed consent to medical treatment by competent adults.
Magnet SR
McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11650589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent: a changing standard of disclosure.
Eslami M
Conn Med; 1984 Jun; 48(6):407. PubMed ID: 11644146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent and the danger of bias in the formation of medical disclosure practices.
Schneyer TJ
Wis L Rev; 1976; 1976(1):124-70. PubMed ID: 11664629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient consent in Louisiana.
Dewey EP
Loyola Law Rev; 1981; 27(4):1166-83. PubMed ID: 11658777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability.
Wallach DM; Berry SJ
St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed refusal. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 166.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]. Committee on Professional Liability
ACOG Comm Opin; 1995 Dec; No. 166():2 p. PubMed ID: 11660328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent.
Grubbs WG
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Canterbury v. Spence--the case and a few comments.
Murphy WJ
Forum; 1976; 11(3):716-26. PubMed ID: 11664620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The performance of invasive procedures by HIV-infected doctors: the duty to disclose under the informed consent doctrine.
DeBarge MW
Conn Law Rev; 1993; 25(3):991-1025. PubMed ID: 11659692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Physicians and surgeons--malpractice--informed consent of patient: duty to inform patient to be established by expert medical testimony.
Wash Law Rev; 1973 May; 48(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 11664248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New trends in informed consent?
Jaeckel LB
Neb Law Rev; 1975; 54(1):66-92. PubMed ID: 11664487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Emerging trends in the physician's duty to disclose: an update of Canterbury v. Spence.
Knapp TA; Huff RL
J Leg Med (N Y); 1975 Jan; 3(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11643353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
