These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658779)
1. Government seeks views on 'test-tube' babies. Vines G New Sci; 1986 Dec; 112(1539):3. PubMed ID: 11658779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Council agrees response to Warnock report. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jan; 290(6463):255-6. PubMed ID: 11658545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Report of the Warnock Committee on Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Priest JA Mod Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 48(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 16100813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Great Britain Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Nov; No. 63():13-21. PubMed ID: 11651088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The week in Plymouth: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jul; 291(6487):72-3. PubMed ID: 11652446 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The start of a long debate on the Warnock report. Deitch R Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238. PubMed ID: 11644288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The British law on assisted reproduction: a liberal law by comparison with many other European laws. Sutton A Ethics Med; 1996; 12(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 11660744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States. Stenger RL J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive technology: in Britain, the debate after the Warnock Report. Gillon R Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S16-8. PubMed ID: 11644023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Law for protection of embryos. Germany Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Great Britain Halsburys Statut Engl G B; 1990 Nov; 38():105-61. PubMed ID: 12041434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. House of Commons votes for ban on embryo research. Med World News; 1985 Apr; 26(7):30. PubMed ID: 11649605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What should we do with surplus potential humans? Annas GJ Washington Post; 1985 Mar; ():K1, K5. PubMed ID: 11647789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Powell bites dust: the British government needs to think hard about surrogacy. Nature; 1985 Apr; 314(6012):568. PubMed ID: 11658566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Supplementary annual report, Appendix VII: BMA response to DHSS consultation document "Legislation on human infertility services and embryo research. British Medical Association Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1987 May; 294(6582):1303-4. PubMed ID: 11653788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 -- a British case history for legislation on bioethical issues. Bolton V; Osborn J; Servante D J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 11651386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New techniques in the field of human fertilization and embryology. Council of Europe. Parliamentary Assembly Hum Reprod; 1986 Jun; 1(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 11643963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Liberty and assisted reproduction. Robertson JA Trial; 1994 Aug; 30(8):48-53. PubMed ID: 11654494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Why Warnock's 14-day rule may be unworkable. Connor S New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):6. PubMed ID: 11658553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]