121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658782)
1. Incompetency--Massachusetts applies substituted judgment to probate court sterilization proceedings--In re Moe, 385 Mass. 555, 432 N.E.2d 712 (1982).
Brewer PJ
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1983; 17(1):211-20. PubMed ID: 11658782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Moe.
Massachusetts. Appeals Court, Plymouth
North East Rep Second Ser; 1991 Oct; 579():682-7. PubMed ID: 12041236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Matter of Moe.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
North East Rep Second Ser; 1982 Mar; 432():712-24. PubMed ID: 12041253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Grady--voluntary sterilization and the retarded.
Denkin JF
Rutgers Law Rev; 1982; 34(3):567-90. PubMed ID: 11658757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sterilization of the mentally retarded: who decides?
Lottman MS
Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):61-64, 77-78. PubMed ID: 11649515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Voluntary sterilization of the non-institutionalized mentally incompetent individual: judicial involvement or abstention?
Sachs LB
New Engl Law Rev; 1981-1982; 17(2):527-47. PubMed ID: 11658327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Eve decision -- a common law perspective.
Keyserlingk EW
Rev Gen Droit; 1987; 18(3):657-75. PubMed ID: 11659379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The sterilization rights of mental retardates.
Munro AB
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1982; 39(1):207-21. PubMed ID: 11658661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A doctor's and parent's dilemma: sterilisation of the intellectually disabled.
Monahan P
Law Inst J; 1991 Aug; 65(8):712-3. PubMed ID: 11659485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Balancing the right of the mentally retarded to obtain a therapeutic sterilization against the potential for abuse.
Irvine AC
Law Psychol Rev; 1988; 12():95-122. PubMed ID: 11660733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sterilization of the mentally retarded adult: the Eve case.
Starkman B
McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):931-50. PubMed ID: 11650594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Massachusetts law--the substituted judgment doctrine expands beyond life-prolonging decisions--In re Guardianship of Roe.
Stebbins MJ
West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):565-87. PubMed ID: 11658604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sterilization--where mentally retarded and presumably fertile daughter cannot understand or exercise her constitutional right to voluntary sterilization, equity court has jurisdiction to empower parents to exercise right on her behalf.
Fritschner SH
J Fam Law; 1980 Apr; 18(3):648-53. PubMed ID: 11658339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Sterilisation and the mentally handicapped.
Cooney T
Dubl Univ Law J; 1989; 11(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 11659291
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Addressing the consent issue involved in the sterilization of mentally incompetent females.
Davis DD
Albany Law Rev; 1979; 43(2):322-38. PubMed ID: 11665120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Capacity, competence, consent: voluntary sterilization of the mentally retarded.
Neuwirth GS; Heisler PA; Goldrich KS
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):447-72. PubMed ID: 11663600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sterilization case has become fight over rights of retarded.
Goldberg D
Washington Post; 1994 Nov; ():A3. PubMed ID: 11647984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sterilization of the mentally retarded minor: the Re K. case.
Finch-Noyes CA
Can J Fam Law; 1986; 5(1):277-99. PubMed ID: 11659190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Court authorizes forced sterility.
N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():B7. PubMed ID: 11646669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Court sets standards for choosing which retarded adolescents should be sterilized.
Ob Gyn News; 1982 Oct 15-31; 17(20):44. PubMed ID: 11655560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
