821 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658796)
1. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill.
Neff RC
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
Dlugacz HA
Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look.
Malmquist CP
J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):137-64. PubMed ID: 11658821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The standard of proof necessary in involuntary civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Coleman SS
S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(2):379-91. PubMed ID: 11665199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1992 May; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Involuntary commitment: the move toward dangerousness.
Weissbourd R
John Marshall Law Rev; 1982; 15(1):83-113. PubMed ID: 11658335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Law, psychotherapy and the duty to warn: a tragic trilogy?
Ayres RJ; Holbrook JT
Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(4):677-705. PubMed ID: 11664669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Crazy" until proven innocent? Civil commitment of the mentally ill homeless.
Kaufman MS
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1988; 19(2):333-67. PubMed ID: 11659184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Judicial decisions in civil commitment: facts, attitudes, and psychiatric recommendations.
Hiday VA
Law Soc Rev; 1983; 17(3):517-30. PubMed ID: 11658694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Involuntary civil commitment in Ontario: the need to curtail the abuses of psychiatry.
Anand R
Can Bar Rev; 1979 Jun; 57(2):250-80. PubMed ID: 11658494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
Wallach S
Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of Addington v. Texas on involuntary civil commitment.
Hays JR
Psychol Rep; 1981 Dec; 65(3 pt. 2):1211-5. PubMed ID: 11659310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
Grant GM
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Civil commitment--due process and the standard of proof.
Brent DJ
De Paul Law Rev; 1974; 23(4):1500-11. PubMed ID: 11664498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
Brooks AD
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
Klein DW
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
