These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658805)
1. Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study. Part Two. Robertson G Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1985 Mar; 18(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11658805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study. Part One. Robertson G Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1985 Jan; 18(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 11658769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informed decision making: CMA policy summary. Canadian Medical Association CMAJ; 1986 Nov; 135(10):1208A-B. PubMed ID: 11658851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent: ethical considerations for physicians and surgeons. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1988 Jan; 21(1):24a-b. PubMed ID: 11649951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Emerging trends in the physician's duty to disclose: an update of Canterbury v. Spence. Knapp TA; Huff RL J Leg Med (N Y); 1975 Jan; 3(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11643353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Consent to medical treatment in Canada. Picard EI Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent to abortion: a refinement. Jipping TL Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1987-1988 Winter; 38(3):329-86. PubMed ID: 11659038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent: from disclosure to patient participation in medical decisionmaking. Simpson RE Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 76(1):172-207. PubMed ID: 11658361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent and the danger of bias in the formation of medical disclosure practices. Schneyer TJ Wis L Rev; 1976; 1976(1):124-70. PubMed ID: 11664629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes. Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient consent in Louisiana. Dewey EP Loyola Law Rev; 1981; 27(4):1166-83. PubMed ID: 11658777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Their treatment, their lives, their decisions. Kolata G N Y Times Mag; 1994 Apr; ():66, 100, 105. PubMed ID: 11647974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis. Monks SS Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent, termination of medical treatment, and the Federal Tort Claims Act: a new proposal for the military health care system. Deardorff SE Mil Law Rev; 1987 Jan; 115():1-120. PubMed ID: 11658904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent. Halligan PD LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas. Cluff CA Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 11655722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent: a changing standard of disclosure. Eslami M Conn Med; 1984 Jun; 48(6):407. PubMed ID: 11644146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right to say yes: the ethics of consent to medical treatment. Scutt JA Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 11653999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legislating for an informed consent to medical treatment by competent adults. Magnet SR McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11650589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]