185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658819)
21. Revising Pennsylvania's involuntary civil commitment statute.
Vater JA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 11664513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization: a review of the statutes regulating the social control of the mentally ill.
Gove WR; Tovo M; Hughes M
Deviant Behav; 1985; 6():287-318. PubMed ID: 11658830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Mental health code of practice revised.
Bull Med Ethics; 1993 Oct; No. 92():8-11. PubMed ID: 11652232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
King P
J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. States move to ease law committing mentally ill.
Goleman D
N Y Times Web; 1986 Dec; ():C1, C4. PubMed ID: 11647825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Involuntary treatment for the homeless mentally ill.
Lamb HR
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1989; 4(2):269-80. PubMed ID: 11659204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Legal rights of the mentally impaired.
Dowben C
Houst Law Rev; 1979 May; 16(4):833-901. PubMed ID: 11651659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Community mental health treatment for the mentally ill -- when does less restrictive treatment become a right?
Seicshnaydre SE
Tulane Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 66(6):1971-2001. PubMed ID: 11660060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Psychiatric care and the law of substitute decision-making.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1987; 11(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11658868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Institutionalizing the rights of mental patients: committing the legislature.
Morris GH
Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):957-1024. PubMed ID: 11663464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Woe v. Cuomo.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Fed Report; 1984 Feb; 729():96-108. PubMed ID: 11648497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Paternalism, civil commitment and illness politics: assessing the current debate and outlining a future direction.
Arrigo BA
J Law Health; 1992-1993; 7(2):131-68. PubMed ID: 11652819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Civil rights groups attack psychiatric care.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1993 Jun; 306(6892):1562-3. PubMed ID: 11643140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Treating the mentally disordered offender: society's uncertain, conflicted, and changing views.
Hafemeister TL; Petrila J
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(3):729-871. PubMed ID: 11660258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Law of 2 July 1992 of the Russian Federation on psychiatric care and the safeguarding of citizens' rights in the dispensing of such care.
Russian Federation
Int Dig Health Legis; 1993; 44(2):267-81. PubMed ID: 11655198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Stromberg CD; Stone AA
Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Realism in mental health law reform: the 1987 amendments to the Japanese mental health law.
Harding TW
Int Dig Health Legis; 1989; 40(1):254-60. PubMed ID: 11659175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Power, professionals, and arguments against civil commitment.
Page S
Prof Psychol; 1975 Nov; 6(4):381-93. PubMed ID: 11664528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Judicially-ordered involuntary treatment of the mentally ill.
Sullivan JL
J Mo Bar; 1975 Jun; 31():254-8. PubMed ID: 11664534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
