These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11658819)

  • 61. Court bolsters mental patients' rights.
    Herbert W
    Sci News; 1982 Jun; 121(26):420. PubMed ID: 11658305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Japan's search for international guidelines on rights of mental patients.
    Harding TW
    Lancet; 1987 Mar; 1(8534):676-7. PubMed ID: 2882093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Open Sesame: the Constitution and mental institutions.
    Trotter RJ
    Sci News; 1975 Jul; 108(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 11664469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment.
    Winthrop LF
    Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 13(1):168-87. PubMed ID: 11664747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?
    Zenoff EH; Zients AB
    George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Guidelines for involuntary civil commitment.
    National Center for State Courts' Institute on Mental Disability and the Law
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(5):409-514. PubMed ID: 11659039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Beyond Rouse and Wyatt: an administrative law model for expanding and implementing the mental patient's right to treatment.
    Hoffman PB; Dunn RC
    Va Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 61(2):297-340. PubMed ID: 11664472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Involuntary civil commitment of mental patients in Israel and the protection of civil rights.
    Bazak J
    Int J Med Law; 1979; 1(2):129-46. PubMed ID: 11662750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The least restrictive alternative to involuntary hospitalization, outpatient commitment: its use and effectiveness.
    Hiday VA; Goodman RR
    J Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(1):81-96. PubMed ID: 11658377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
    Miller HL
    Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The role of the court as mental health laws change.
    Flaschner FN
    Ill Bar J; 1973 Nov; 62(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 11664277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. In search of a sane commitment statute.
    Treffert DA; Krajeck RW
    Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
    Cort RS
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Civil commitment and the right to treatment.
    Kelly DS
    LA Law Rev; 1975; 35(2):563-9. PubMed ID: 11664468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The right to treatment for mentally ill juveniles in California.
    Lovell JE
    Hastings Law J; 1976 Mar; 27(4):865-93. PubMed ID: 11664617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs.
    Hahn WA
    Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals.
    Anderson K
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1976; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Treatment rights of mentally ill nursing home residents.
    Barnett CF
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1978 Jan; 126(3):578-629. PubMed ID: 11664875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Constitutional law: mental patients and court ordered standards of treatment.
    Milton TT
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1973; 25(3):614-9. PubMed ID: 11664237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The dangerousness standard: what is it and how is it used?
    Mestrovic SG; Cook JA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986; 8():443-69. PubMed ID: 11658898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.